"Does it come in black?" CLIP-like models are zero-shot recommenders

AI-generated keywords: CLIP-based models Zero-shot recommenders Product Discovery Comparative Recommendations GradREC

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • CLIP-like models are zero-shot recommenders
  • Current item-to-item recommendation systems do not allow users to explore changes along selected dimensions
  • CLIP-based models can suggest items similar to a query item but with different attributes such as color
  • The authors propose using CLIP-based models as zero-shot recommenders for comparative item recommendations
  • GradREC, a large model built for fashion, effectively supports this use case
  • GradREC has the potential to enhance product discovery and improve the online shopping experience
  • The paper examines the industry potential of GradREC and assesses its strengths and weaknesses
  • Comparative recommendations are significant in online shopping platforms
  • CLIP-based models like GradREC fulfill the need for comparative recommendations efficiently
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Patrick John Chia, Jacopo Tagliabue, Federico Bianchi, Ciro Greco, Diogo Goncalves

Accepted at ACL 2022 (ECNLP)

Abstract: Product discovery is a crucial component for online shopping. However, item-to-item recommendations today do not allow users to explore changes along selected dimensions: given a query item, can a model suggest something similar but in a different color? We consider item recommendations of the comparative nature (e.g. "something darker") and show how CLIP-based models can support this use case in a zero-shot manner. Leveraging a large model built for fashion, we introduce GradREC and its industry potential, and offer a first rounded assessment of its strength and weaknesses.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Apr. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2204.02473v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

CLIP-like models are zero-shot recommenders, and authors Patrick John Chia, Jacopo Tagliabue, Federico Bianchi, Ciro Greco and Diogo Goncalves discuss the importance of product discovery in online shopping. They emphasize that current item-to-item recommendation systems do not enable users to explore changes along selected dimensions. For instance, if a user wants to find something similar to a query item but in a different color, existing models cannot provide suitable recommendations. To address this limitation, the authors propose using CLIP-based models as zero-shot recommenders for item recommendations of a comparative nature. These models can suggest items that are similar to the query item but differ in specific attributes such as color. The authors demonstrate how leveraging a large model built for fashion called GradREC can support this use case effectively. The paper also examines the industry potential of GradREC and provides an initial assessment of its strengths and weaknesses. By allowing users to explore changes along selected dimensions, GradREC has the potential to enhance product discovery and improve the overall online shopping experience. Overall, this paper highlights the significance of incorporating comparative recommendations into online shopping platforms and showcases how CLIP-based models like GradREC can fulfill this need efficiently. The findings presented contribute to advancing recommendation systems in e-commerce and offer valuable insights for researchers and industry professionals alike.
Created on 26 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.