Word-of-Mouth on Action: Analysis of Operational Decisions When Customers are Resentful

AI-generated keywords: WoM customer reviews operational decisions perceived service quality profitability

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Word-of-Mouth (WoM) communication through customer reviews influences purchasing decisions in online shopping.
  • Retailers must consider the impact of WoM to manage customer perceptions and future demand.
  • The paper "Word-of-Mouth on Action: Analysis of Operational Decisions When Customers are Resentful" studies an online shopping system with premium and regular customers to model customer preferences based on perceived service quality indicated by WoM.
  • The authors integrate this information into the retailer's operational problem to determine a shipment policy.
  • The paper considers the e-tailer's problem when they have no knowledge of WoM and only react to changes in demand, showing that potential market size and customer sensitivity are key parameters determining long-term customer behavior.
  • The authors build a model that integrates knowledge of WoM into operational decision-making processes while partially characterizing the optimal solution.
  • Beating competition in the market may not always benefit companies under strict operational constraints as it can result in undesired customer switching behavior.
  • Relaxations in operational constraints may hurt profitability due to difficulties associated with managing perceptions.
  • Seeking a stationary policy can lead to suboptimal solutions; therefore, cyclic policies should also be considered when appropriate.
  • Retailers need to consider WoM communication when making operational decisions about shipment policies to better manage customer perceptions and future demand while ensuring profitability is maintained at an acceptable level.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Bahar Çavdar, Nesim Erkip

Abstract: Word-of-Mouth (WoM) communication, via online reviews, plays an important role in customers' purchasing decisions. As such, retailers must consider the impact of WoM to manage customer perceptions and future demand. In this paper, we consider an online shopping system with premium and regular customers. Building on the behavioral and operations management literature, we model customer preferences based on the perceived service quality indicated by WoM and integrate this into the retailer's operational problem to determine a shipment policy. First, we study the e-tailer's problem when she has no knowledge of WoM, and only reacts to the changes in demand. We analyze the long-term behavior of customer demand and show that potential market size and customer sensitivity are the key parameters determining this behavior. Then, we build a model to integrate knowledge of WoM into operational decision making and partially characterize the optimal solution. We show that (i) beating the competition in the market may not always benefit the company under strict operational constraints as it can result in undesired customer switching behavior, (ii) relaxations in operational constraints may hurt profitability due to the associated difficulties of managing perceptions, and (iii) seeking a stationary policy can lead to suboptimal solutions, therefore cyclic policies should also be considered when appropriate.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Mar. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.11251v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the world of online shopping, Word-of-Mouth (WoM) communication through customer reviews plays a significant role in influencing purchasing decisions. As such, retailers must consider the impact of WoM to manage customer perceptions and future demand. In their paper titled "Word-of-Mouth on Action: Analysis of Operational Decisions When Customers are Resentful," authors Bahar Çavdar and Nesim Erkip delve into this topic by studying an online shopping system with both premium and regular customers. Building on existing literature in behavioral and operations management, the authors model customer preferences based on perceived service quality indicated by WoM. They then integrate this information into the retailer's operational problem to determine a shipment policy. The paper first considers the e-tailer's problem when they have no knowledge of WoM and only react to changes in demand. Through their analysis, they show that potential market size and customer sensitivity are key parameters determining long-term customer behavior. Next, the authors build a model that integrates knowledge of WoM into operational decision-making processes while partially characterizing the optimal solution. They find that beating competition in the market may not always benefit companies under strict operational constraints as it can result in undesired customer switching behavior. Additionally, relaxations in operational constraints may hurt profitability due to difficulties associated with managing perceptions. Seeking a stationary policy can lead to suboptimal solutions; therefore, cyclic policies should also be considered when appropriate. Overall, this paper highlights how important it is for retailers to consider WoM communication when making operational decisions about shipment policies. By doing so, they can better manage customer perceptions and future demand while also ensuring profitability is maintained at an acceptable level.
Created on 09 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.