Forecast Evaluation for Data Scientists: Common Pitfalls and Best Practices

AI-generated keywords: Machine Learning Deep Learning Forecasting Time Series Data Best Practices

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Traditional forecasting methods are being replaced by advanced techniques tailored for specific tasks in machine learning and deep learning.
  • Deep learning has made significant progress in areas like image recognition, signal processing, and speech analysis, but forecasting lags behind.
  • Forecasting concepts have not yet become mainstream knowledge among general machine learning practitioners.
  • One of the key challenges in applying machine learning techniques to forecasting is dealing with non-stationarities in time series data.
  • Recent trends show that machine learning models can excel in forecasting with access to vast amounts of time series data if potential pitfalls are addressed effectively.
  • The tutorial focuses on providing a comprehensive guide on forecast evaluation within the context of machine learning, addressing common problematic characteristics of time series data such as non-normalities and non-stationarities.
  • Best practices for forecast evaluation include data partitioning, error calculation, statistical testing, and selecting appropriate error measures based on dataset characteristics.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hansika Hewamalage, Klaus Ackermann, Christoph Bergmeir

Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) methods are increasingly replacing traditional methods in many domains involved with important decision making activities. DL techniques tailor-made for specific tasks such as image recognition, signal processing, or speech analysis are being introduced at a fast pace with many improvements. However, for the domain of forecasting, the current state in the ML community is perhaps where other domains such as Natural Language Processing and Computer Vision were at several years ago. The field of forecasting has mainly been fostered by statisticians/econometricians; consequently the related concepts are not the mainstream knowledge among general ML practitioners. The different non-stationarities associated with time series challenge the data-driven ML models. Nevertheless, recent trends in the domain have shown that with the availability of massive amounts of time series, ML techniques are quite competent in forecasting, when related pitfalls are properly handled. Therefore, in this work we provide a tutorial-like compilation of the details of one of the most important steps in the overall forecasting process, namely the evaluation. This way, we intend to impart the information of forecast evaluation to fit the context of ML, as means of bridging the knowledge gap between traditional methods of forecasting and state-of-the-art ML techniques. We elaborate on the different problematic characteristics of time series such as non-normalities and non-stationarities and how they are associated with common pitfalls in forecast evaluation. Best practices in forecast evaluation are outlined with respect to the different steps such as data partitioning, error calculation, statistical testing, and others. Further guidelines are also provided along selecting valid and suitable error measures depending on the specific characteristics of the dataset at hand.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Mar. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.10716v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), traditional forecasting methods are being increasingly replaced by more advanced techniques tailored for specific tasks such as image recognition, signal processing, and speech analysis. While DL has made significant strides in these areas, the domain of forecasting still lags behind. This is reminiscent of where natural language processing and computer vision were several years ago within the ML community. Historically driven by statisticians and econometricians, forecasting concepts have not yet become mainstream knowledge among general ML practitioners. One of the key challenges in applying ML techniques to forecasting lies in the inherent non-stationarities associated with time series data. Despite this hurdle, recent trends suggest that with access to vast amounts of time series data, ML models can indeed excel in forecasting when potential pitfalls are effectively addressed. To bridge the gap between traditional forecasting methods and cutting-edge ML approaches, this work focuses on providing a comprehensive tutorial on forecast evaluation – a critical step in the overall forecasting process. The tutorial delves into the nuances of forecast evaluation within the context of ML, shedding light on common problematic characteristics of time series data such as non-normalities and non-stationarities. By outlining best practices for forecast evaluation including data partitioning, error calculation, statistical testing, and more, this work aims to equip data scientists with necessary tools to navigate through these challenges effectively. Moreover, guidelines are provided for selecting appropriate error measures based on specific dataset characteristics. Authored by Hansika Hewamalage, Klaus Ackermann and Christoph Bergmeir "Forecast Evaluation for Data Scientists: Common Pitfalls and Best Practices" serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners seeking to enhance their understanding of forecast evaluation within the realm of machine learning.
Created on 19 Jun. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.