Planet Formation Theory in the Era of ALMA and Kepler: from Pebbles to Exoplanets
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Planet formation theory has advanced significantly in recent years due to improved observational capabilities.
- Classical planet formation theory has been revised to account for the observed diversity of exoplanetary systems.
- A group of researchers summarize the latest developments in planet formation theory in a review chapter accepted by Protostars and Planets VII.
- The chapter covers various aspects of planet formation theory, including dust evolution and growth of planetary cores through accretion.
- There are preferential locations for the formation of planetesimals and planets in circumstellar disks, with a significant fraction of solids not growing past pebble-sizes outside these locations.
- Massive planetary cores emerge over different timescales within one disk, with evidence that the first planetary cores start forming early during circumstellar disk buildup processes.
- State-of-the-art models for diverse planetary system formations are reviewed, including population synthesis approaches necessary to compare theoretical model outcomes with exoplanet populations.
- Many exoplanetary systems could have formed differently from our own Solar System according to these models.
- Observations from ALMA and Kepler missions provide new constraints on the process of planet formation.
Authors: Joanna Drazkowska, Bertram Bitsch, Michiel Lambrechts, Gijs D. Mulders, Daniel Harsono, Allona Vazan, Beibei Liu, Chris W. Ormel, Katherine Kretke, Alessandro Morbidelli
Abstract: Our understanding of planet formation has been rapidly evolving in recent years. The classical planet formation theory, developed when the only known planetary system was our own Solar System, has been revised to account for the observed diversity of the exoplanetary systems. At the same time, the increasing observational capabilities of the young stars and their surrounding disks bring new constraints on the planet formation process. In this chapter, we summarize the new information derived from the exoplanets population and the circumstellar disks observations. We present the new developments in planet formation theory, from dust evolution to the growth of planetary cores by accretion of planetesimals, pebbles, and gas. We review the state-of-the-art models for the formation of diverse planetary systems, including the population synthesis approach which is necessary to compare theoretical model outcomes to the exoplanet population. We emphasize that the planet formation process may not be spatially uniform in the disk and there are preferential locations for the formation of planetesimals and planets. Outside of these locations, a significant fraction of solids is not growing past the pebble-sizes. The reservoir of pebbles plays an important role in the growth of planetary cores in the pebble accretion process. The timescale of the emergence of massive planetary cores is an important aspect of the present models and it is likely that the cores within one disk form at different times. In addition, there is growing evidence that the first planetary cores start forming early, during the circumstellar disk buildup process.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.