Dynamic groups in complex task environments: To change or not to change a winning team?
AI-generated Key Points
- Organizations rely on group formation to solve complex tasks
- Groups adapt to the demands of the task by changing their composition periodically
- Previous research on the effects of group adaptation on task performance has produced ambiguous results
- Researchers conducted an agent-based model study using the NK-framework to better understand this relationship
- Reorganizing well-performing groups may be beneficial, but only if individual learning is restricted
- Centralizing decision-making led to better performance than random or decentralized decision-making for low-complexity tasks (K=3)
- Decentralized decision-making was more effective than centralization or randomness for moderate complexity tasks (K=5)
- Group adaptation had a positive effect on performance for both low and moderate complexity tasks when individual learning was restricted
- Group adaptation had a negative impact on performance for moderate complexity tasks when individual learning was not restricted
- The study highlights the importance of considering both individual learning and task complexity when examining the impact of group adaptation on performance in complex environments.
- Organizations should carefully consider whether to change their winning teams depending on these factors.
Authors: Darío Blanco-Fernández, Stephan Leitner, Alexandra Rausch
Abstract: Organisations rely upon group formation to solve complex tasks, and groups often adapt to the demands of the task they face by changing their composition periodically. Previous research comes to ambiguous results regarding the effects of group adaptation on task performance. This paper aims to understand the impact of group adaptation, defined as a process of periodically changing a group's composition, on complex task performance and considers the moderating role of individual learning and task complexity in this relationship. We base our analyses on an agent-based model of adaptive groups in a complex task environment based on the NK-framework. The results indicate that reorganising well-performing groups might be beneficial, but only if individual learning is restricted. However, there are also cases in which group adaptation might unfold adverse effects. We provide extensive analyses that shed additional light on and, thereby, help explain the ambiguous results of previous research.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.