Toward Ethical AIED

AI-generated keywords: Ethics AIED Stakeholder Perspectives Transparency Precision

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper presents key conclusions from the forthcoming edited book on The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Diverse perspectives are highlighted, both from within and outside the field of AI in Education (AIED)
  • Chapter 6 provides a detailed map of stakeholder perspectives that are crucial to gaining a better understanding of questions that need to be asked about AI in Education operating within larger socio-technical settings
  • Other chapters highlight how learners' diverse needs and perspectives are often invisible to curriculum designers and AI system developers
  • There is a need to view AIED as an applied ethics field where ethical considerations are integrated into all aspects of research, development, deployment, and evaluation
  • Increased collaboration between researchers across disciplines such as computer science, education, philosophy, law, sociology, psychology, and neuroscience is called for
  • Ethical considerations must be integrated throughout all stages of research and development if we are to create fairer AI systems that serve learners' diverse needs effectively.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, Wayne Holmes

11 pages; concluding chapter from the forthcoming book to be printed by Routledge in August 2022
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: This paper presents the key conclusions to the forthcoming edited book on The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Practices, Challenges and Debates (August 2022, Routlege). As well as highlighting the key contributions to the book, it discusses the key questions and the grand challenges for the field of AI in Education (AIED)in the context of ethics and ethical practices within the field. The book itself presents diverse perspectives from outside and from within the AIED as a way of achieving a broad perspective in the key ethical issues for AIED and a deep understanding of work conducted to date by the AIED community.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Mar. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.07067v1

This paper, titled "Toward Ethical AIED," presents the key conclusions from the forthcoming edited book on The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Practices, Challenges and Debates (to be published by Routledge in August 2022). The paper highlights the diverse perspectives presented in the book, both from within and outside the field of AI in Education (AIED), as a means of achieving a broad perspective on key ethical issues for AIED. Chapter 6 of the book, authored by Holstein and Doroudi, provides a detailed map of stakeholder perspectives that are crucial to gaining a better understanding of questions that need to be asked about AI in Education operating within larger socio-technical settings. This chapter emphasizes the need for transparency and precision in declaring whose perspective is being emphasized since different perspectives may lead to different conclusions. Other chapters in the book highlight how too often, learners' diverse needs and perspectives are invisible to curriculum designers and AI system developers. The authors also discuss grand challenges for AIED with respect to ethics and ethical practices within the field. They argue that there is a need to view AIED as an applied ethics field where ethical considerations are integrated into all aspects of research, development, deployment, and evaluation. Additionally, they call for increased collaboration between researchers across disciplines such as computer science, education, philosophy, law, sociology, psychology, and neuroscience. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into current debates surrounding ethics in AIED. It highlights the importance of considering diverse stakeholder perspectives when designing AI systems for education while emphasizing the need for transparency and precision regarding whose perspective is being prioritized. Furthermore, it underscores how ethical considerations must be integrated throughout all stages of research and development if we are to create fairer AI systems that serve learners' diverse needs effectively.
Created on 31 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.