Toward Ethical AIED
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper presents key conclusions from the forthcoming edited book on The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Diverse perspectives are highlighted, both from within and outside the field of AI in Education (AIED)
- Chapter 6 provides a detailed map of stakeholder perspectives that are crucial to gaining a better understanding of questions that need to be asked about AI in Education operating within larger socio-technical settings
- Other chapters highlight how learners' diverse needs and perspectives are often invisible to curriculum designers and AI system developers
- There is a need to view AIED as an applied ethics field where ethical considerations are integrated into all aspects of research, development, deployment, and evaluation
- Increased collaboration between researchers across disciplines such as computer science, education, philosophy, law, sociology, psychology, and neuroscience is called for
- Ethical considerations must be integrated throughout all stages of research and development if we are to create fairer AI systems that serve learners' diverse needs effectively.
Authors: Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, Wayne Holmes
Abstract: This paper presents the key conclusions to the forthcoming edited book on The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Practices, Challenges and Debates (August 2022, Routlege). As well as highlighting the key contributions to the book, it discusses the key questions and the grand challenges for the field of AI in Education (AIED)in the context of ethics and ethical practices within the field. The book itself presents diverse perspectives from outside and from within the AIED as a way of achieving a broad perspective in the key ethical issues for AIED and a deep understanding of work conducted to date by the AIED community.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.