Addressing Randomness in Evaluation Protocols for Out-of-Distribution Detection
AI-generated Key Points
- Deep neural networks are popular for classification tasks but can behave unpredictably with inputs outside of the training distribution
- Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection mechanisms are needed to address this issue
- Evaluating OOD detection methods on unseen data is challenging due to lack of prior information on OOD data
- Contemporary evaluation protocols rely on open set simulations, which involve splitting a dataset into in- and out-of-distribution samples and averaging performance over several synthetic random splits
- Open set simulation frameworks include several sources of randomness that can significantly impact results
- Too few simulations may fail to provide reliable estimates of expected performance as outcomes largely depend on chance
- The authors propose treating OOD method evaluation in open set simulations as a fundamentally probabilistic process and estimating expected performance using a Monte Carlo approach to draw more reliable conclusions
- Hypothesis tests demonstrated even a considerable number of simulations was insufficient to infer statistically significant performance differences between compared methods
- Future work should investigate other OOD evaluation protocols not based on open set simulations and include different types of data such as natural language, sound, or video.
- Studying individual sources of randomness might help quantify their contribution to fluctuations and enable better experiment design.
- This study aimed to demonstrate the brittleness of current best practice evaluation protocols rather than evaluate specific methods. Different experimental setups or hyperparameters could lead to different conclusions regarding method performance; however, these experiments might also be subject to inherent randomness and should address it accordingly.
- Overall, this study highlights the importance of addressing randomness in evaluating OOD detection methods and proposes a new approach to estimate expected performance more reliably by treating OOD method evaluation in open set simulations as a probabilistic process through Monte Carlo approaches for drawing more reliable conclusions about method performances while accounting for different sources of randomness when designing experiments.
Authors: Konstantin Kirchheim, Tim Gonschorek, Frank Ortmeier
Abstract: Deep Neural Networks for classification behave unpredictably when confronted with inputs not stemming from the training distribution. This motivates out-of-distribution detection (OOD) mechanisms. The usual lack of prior information on out-of-distribution data renders the performance estimation of detection approaches on unseen data difficult. Several contemporary evaluation protocols are based on open set simulations, which average the performance over up to five synthetic random splits of a dataset into in- and out-of-distribution samples. However, the number of possible splits may be much larger, and the performance of Deep Neural Networks is known to fluctuate significantly depending on different sources of random variation. We empirically demonstrate that current protocols may fail to provide reliable estimates of the expected performance of OOD methods. By casting this evaluation as a random process, we generalize the concept of open set simulations and propose to estimate the performance of OOD methods using a Monte Carlo approach that addresses the randomness.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.