Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2202.12008v1

The insurance business relies on the classification of insured individuals into risky and non-risky categories, with actuarial fairness dictating that those who are deemed riskier should pay higher premiums than those who are less risky. Actuaries use econometric or machine learning techniques to classify individuals, but there is a fine line between fair actuarial classification and discrimination. As such, there is growing interest in fairness and discrimination within the actuarial community. Non-sensitive characteristics can serve as substitutes or proxies for protected attributes, but using them alone may not be enough to maintain adequate accuracy. Traditional pricing models are built in a two-stage structure that considers many potentially biased components such as car or geographic risks, which has significant limitations in achieving fairness. To address this issue, the authors have developed a novel pricing model approach that utilizes autoencoders to generate geographic and car pricing components needed to predict pure premiums while mitigating unwanted bias according to desired metrics. This approach can be generalized to multiple pricing factors and is perfectly adapted for a fairness context since it allows for debiasing of the set of pricing components. The authors' findings suggest that debiasing the predictor alone may not be sufficient to achieve adequate accuracy in predicting insurance prices, highlighting the importance of developing fairer pricing models in the insurance industry.

• - Insurance business relies on classification of insured individuals into risky and non-risky categories
• - Actuarial fairness dictates that riskier individuals should pay higher premiums
• - Actuaries use econometric or machine learning techniques to classify individuals
• - Fine line between fair actuarial classification and discrimination
• - Growing interest in fairness and discrimination within the actuarial community
• - Non-sensitive characteristics can serve as substitutes for protected attributes, but may not be enough for accuracy
• - Traditional pricing models have limitations in achieving fairness due to potentially biased components such as car or geographic risks
• - Authors developed a novel pricing model approach utilizing autoencoders to generate geographic and car pricing components while mitigating unwanted bias according to desired metrics
• - Approach can be generalized to multiple pricing factors and is adapted for a fairness context allowing for debiasing of the set of pricing components
• - Debiasing predictor alone may not be sufficient for adequate accuracy in predicting insurance prices
• - Importance of developing fairer pricing models in the insurance industry

1. Insurance companies divide people into groups based on how risky they are to insure. 2. People who are more likely to have accidents or get sick pay higher insurance prices. 3. Experts called actuaries use math and computers to figure out which group someone belongs in. 4. It's important to be fair when deciding how much someone should pay for insurance, but it can be hard to do without being unfair to some people. 5. Some researchers made a new way of deciding insurance prices that tries to be fairer by using special computer programs. Definitions- Insurance: a system where people pay money (called premiums) so that if something bad happens (like getting sick or having a car accident), the insurance company will help them pay for it - Actuary: an expert who uses math and statistics to figure out how much risk there is in different situations - Premium: the amount of money someone pays for their insurance policy - Fairness: treating everyone equally and not unfairly favoring one group over another - Discrimination: treating someone unfairly because of things like their race, gender, or age

Fairness and Discrimination in the Insurance Industry: A Novel Pricing Model Approach

The insurance business relies on the classification of insured individuals into risky and non-risky categories, with actuarial fairness dictating that those who are deemed riskier should pay higher premiums than those who are less risky. Actuaries use econometric or machine learning techniques to classify individuals, but there is a fine line between fair actuarial classification and discrimination. As such, there is growing interest in fairness and discrimination within the actuarial community. Non-sensitive characteristics can serve as substitutes or proxies for protected attributes, but using them alone may not be enough to maintain adequate accuracy. Traditional pricing models are built in a two-stage structure that considers many potentially biased components such as car or geographic risks, which has significant limitations in achieving fairness. To address this issue, researchers have developed a novel pricing model approach that utilizes autoencoders to generate geographic and car pricing components needed to predict pure premiums while mitigating unwanted bias according to desired metrics.

Autoencoders for Generating Pricing Components

Autoencoders are artificial neural networks used for unsupervised learning tasks such as dimensionality reduction or feature extraction from raw data inputs without any labels or supervision signals. Autoencoders consist of an encoder component which compresses input data into latent representations (or embeddings) and a decoder component which reconstructs the original input from these embeddings. The authors' proposed approach uses autoencoders to generate geographic and car pricing components needed for predicting pure premiums while mitigating unwanted bias according to desired metrics. This approach can be generalized to multiple pricing factors and is perfectly adapted for a fairness context since it allows for debiasing of the set of pricing components by removing any correlations between sensitive attributes (such as gender or race) and other non-sensitive characteristics (such as age).

Findings Suggest Debiasing Alone May Not Be Sufficient

The authors' findings suggest that debiasing the predictor alone may not be sufficient to achieve adequate accuracy in predicting insurance prices when compared with traditional two-stage approaches that consider many potentially biased components such as car or geographic risks. This highlights the importance of developing fairer pricing models in the insurance industry if we want accurate predictions without introducing unfair biases based on certain protected attributes like gender or race.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel approach utilizing autoencoders for generating geographic and car pricing components needed to predict pure premiums while mitigating unwanted bias according to desired metrics. The authors' findings suggest that debiasing alone may not be sufficient when compared with traditional two-stage approaches considering many potentially biased components like car or geographic risks, highlighting the importance of developing fairer pricing models in order to accurately predict insurance prices without introducing unfair biases based on certain protected attributes like gender or race.