Speciesist bias in AI -- How AI applications perpetuate discrimination and unfair outcomes against animals

AI-generated keywords: AI fairness Speciesist bias Violence against animals AI systems Ethical considerations

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • AI fairness has made strides in reducing biases in data and algorithms for fair outcomes for humans
  • There is a blind spot in the AI community's insensitivity to discrimination against animals, perpetuating violence against them
  • "Speciesist bias" is the first described bias against animals investigated in various AI systems
  • Speciesist biases are learned by AI applications trained on datasets containing patterns of discrimination against animals, found in image recognition systems, large language models and recommender systems
  • Current AI technologies play a significant role in normalizing violence against animals, especially farmed animals
  • Widening the scope of AI fairness frameworks to include mitigation measures for speciesist biases is important
  • Mitigating speciesist biases can create more just and equitable outcomes not only for humans but also for non-human animals who are often marginalized by society at large.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Thilo Hagendorff, Leonie Bossert, Tse Yip Fai, Peter Singer

Abstract: Massive efforts are made to reduce biases in both data and algorithms in order to render AI applications fair. These efforts are propelled by various high-profile cases where biased algorithmic decision-making caused harm to women, people of color, minorities, etc. However, the AI fairness field still succumbs to a blind spot, namely its insensitivity to discrimination against animals. This paper is the first to describe the 'speciesist bias' and investigate it in several different AI systems. Speciesist biases are learned and solidified by AI applications when they are trained on datasets in which speciesist patterns prevail. These patterns can be found in image recognition systems, large language models, and recommender systems. Therefore, AI technologies currently play a significant role in perpetuating and normalizing violence against animals. This can only be changed when AI fairness frameworks widen their scope and include mitigation measures for speciesist biases. This paper addresses the AI community in this regard and stresses the influence AI systems can have on either increasing or reducing the violence that is inflicted on animals, and especially on farmed animals.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Feb. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2202.10848v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The field of AI fairness has made significant strides in reducing biases in both data and algorithms to ensure fair outcomes for humans. However, there is a blind spot in the AI community's insensitivity to discrimination against animals, which perpetuates violence against them. This paper, authored by Thilo Hagendorff, Leonie Bossert, Tse Yip Fai and Peter Singer, is the first to describe "speciesist bias" and investigate it in various AI systems. Speciesist biases are learned and solidified by AI applications when they are trained on datasets that contain patterns of discrimination against animals. These patterns can be found in image recognition systems, large language models and recommender systems. The authors argue that current AI technologies play a significant role in normalizing violence against animals and especially farmed animals. They stress the importance of widening the scope of AI fairness frameworks to include mitigation measures for speciesist biases. The paper highlights how AI systems can have a profound influence on either increasing or decreasing the violence inflicted on animals. This study underscores the need for greater awareness among researchers and practitioners about speciesism as a form of bias that must be addressed within the broader context of ethical considerations surrounding AI development. By taking steps to mitigate speciesist biases in their work, developers can help create more just and equitable outcomes not only for humans but also for non-human animals who are often marginalized by society at large.
Created on 28 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.