A decision-tree framework to select optimal box-sizes for product shipments

AI-generated keywords: E-commerce Box Sizing Clustering Decision Tree Optimization

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Use of improperly sized boxes in package-handling facilities can lead to wastage and increased shipping costs
  • E-commerce companies face the challenge of determining the optimal number and dimensions of cuboidal boxes to minimize wastage and shipping costs
  • Proposed solution focuses on single-count shipments with one product per box
  • Solution consists of two steps:
  • Step 1: Reduce problem to a clustering problem in a three-dimensional space defined by length, width, and height
  • Step 2: Present an efficient forward-backward decision tree based clustering method to obtain desired number of clusters and corresponding box dimensions
  • Proposed algorithm allows for incremental generation of clusters without discarding current solution
  • Simulations using actual single-count shipments transported by Amazon showed promising results:
  • Modification of existing box dimensions led to a reduction of 4.4% in shipment volume and decrease in non-utilized air volume space by 2.2%
  • Introduction of four additional boxes improved shipment volume reduction to 10.3% and air volume improvement to 6.1%
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Karthik S. Gurumoorthy, Abhiraj Hinge

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: In package-handling facilities, boxes of varying sizes are used to ship products. Improperly sized boxes with box dimensions much larger than the product dimensions create wastage and unduly increase the shipping costs. Since it is infeasible to make unique, tailor-made boxes for each of the $N$ products, the fundamental question that confronts e-commerce companies is: How many $K << N$ cuboidal boxes need to manufactured and what should be their dimensions? In this paper, we propose a solution for the single-count shipment containing one product per box in two steps: (i) reduce it to a clustering problem in the $3$ dimensional space of length, width and height where each cluster corresponds to the group of products that will be shipped in a particular size variant, and (ii) present an efficient forward-backward decision tree based clustering method with low computational complexity on $N$ and $K$ to obtain these $K$ clusters and corresponding box dimensions. Our algorithm has multiple constituent parts, each specifically designed to achieve a high-quality clustering solution. As our method generates clusters in an incremental fashion without discarding the present solution, adding or deleting a size variant is as simple as stopping the backward pass early or executing it for one more iteration. We tested the efficacy of our approach by simulating actual single-count shipments that were transported during a month by Amazon using the proposed box dimensions. Even by just modifying the existing box dimensions and not adding a new size variant, we achieved a reduction of $4.4\%$ in the shipment volume, contributing to the decrease in non-utilized, air volume space by $2.2\%$. The reduction in shipment volume and air volume improved significantly to $10.3\%$ and $6.1\%$ when we introduced $4$ additional boxes.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Feb. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2202.04277v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In package-handling facilities, the use of boxes with varying sizes to ship products can lead to wastage and increased shipping costs when improperly sized boxes are used. This issue becomes even more challenging for e-commerce companies that deal with a large number of products. The main question they face is how many cuboidal boxes should be manufactured and what should be their dimensions in order to minimize wastage and shipping costs. To address this problem, the authors propose a solution specifically designed for single-count shipments where each box contains only one product. The solution consists of two steps: 1. The first step involves reducing the problem to a clustering problem in a three-dimensional space defined by length, width, and height. Each cluster represents a group of products that will be shipped in a particular size variant. 2. In the second step, the authors present an efficient forward-backward decision tree based clustering method with low computational complexity on N (the total number of products) and K (the desired number of clusters). This method allows them to obtain K clusters along with their corresponding box dimensions. The proposed algorithm is designed to generate clusters incrementally without discarding the current solution. This means that adding or deleting a size variant can be easily achieved by stopping the backward pass early or executing it for one more iteration. To evaluate the efficacy of their approach, the authors conducted simulations using actual single-count shipments transported by Amazon over a month. They used the proposed box dimensions and compared the results with existing box dimensions without introducing any new size variants. The simulations showed promising results; by simply modifying the existing box dimensions they achieved a reduction of 4.4% in shipment volume leading to a decrease in non-utilized air volume space by 2.2%. When four additional boxes were introduced, both shipment volume reduction and air volume improvement improved significantly to 10.3% and 6.1%, respectively.
Created on 27 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.