Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
AI-generated Key Points
- Natural Language Generation (NLG) has made significant advancements in recent years due to the development of deep learning technologies such as Transformer-based language models.
- NLG enables more fluent and coherent natural language generation for downstream tasks like abstractive summarization, dialogue generation, and data-to-text generation.
- However, NLG also generates hallucinated texts that fail to meet users' expectations in real-world scenarios.
- Researchers have presented various evaluation and mitigation methods for hallucinations in different tasks.
- Ziwei Ji and colleagues from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology provide an overview of research progress and challenges related to the hallucination problem in NLG.
- The authors categorize hallucinations into intrinsic (generated text contradicts factual information or common sense) and extrinsic (generated text does not relate to the input).
- They discuss contributors to hallucinations such as data quality issues or errors during training or inference.
- Statistical metrics based on perplexity scores or n-gram overlap ratios as well as model-based metrics like adversarial attacks or gradient-based saliency maps are proposed for evaluating hallucination severity.
- Human evaluation methods like crowd-sourcing are also discussed.
- Various mitigation methods including data augmentation or filtering and regularization or fine-tuning are presented for reducing hallucinations in NLG systems.
- The authors emphasize the need for a standardized evaluation framework for future directions in metrics and mitigation methods.
Authors: Ziwei Ji, Nayeon Lee, Rita Frieske, Tiezheng Yu, Dan Su, Yan Xu, Etsuko Ishii, Yejin Bang, Andrea Madotto, Pascale Fung
Abstract: Natural Language Generation (NLG) has improved exponentially in recent years thanks to the development of deep learning technologies such as Transformer-based language models. This advancement has led to more fluent and coherent natural language generation, naturally leading to development in downstream tasks such as abstractive summarization, dialogue generation and data-to-text generation. However, it is also investigated that such generation includes hallucinated texts, which makes the performances of text generation fail to meet users' expectations in many real-world scenarios. In order to address this issue, studies in evaluation and mitigation methods of hallucinations have been presented in various tasks, but have not been reviewed in a combined manner. In this survey, we provide a broad overview of the research progress and challenges in the hallucination problem of NLG. The survey is organized into two big divisions: (i) a general overview of metrics, mitigation methods, and future directions; (ii) task-specific research progress for hallucinations in a large set of downstream tasks: abstractive summarization, dialogue generation, generative question answering, data-to-text generation, and machine translation. This survey could facilitate collaborative efforts among researchers in these tasks.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.