Filtration and breathability of nonwoven fabrics used in washable masks

AI-generated keywords: Fabrics Filtration Breathability Washing Protocols Layering

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study investigated the effectiveness of nonwoven and woven fabrics in improving the performance of all-cotton masks.
  • Nonwoven polyester and nonwoven polypropylene demonstrated higher quality factors than woven materials such as flannel cotton, Kona cotton, and sateen cotton.
  • Materials with meltblown nonwoven polypropylene were found to filter best, particularly against submicron particles.
  • Sets incorporating meltblown nonwoven polypropylene designed for filtration degraded significantly post-wash in the submicron range where they excelled prior to washing.
  • Post-wash quality factors were similar for all multi-layer sets in this study but higher than Kona quilting cotton.
  • Washed multi-layer sets filtered between 12-42 percent of particles with a diameter of 0.5 microns, between 27-76 percent of particles with a diameter of one micron, between 58-96 percent of particles with a diameter of 2.8 microns, and between 72-100 percent of particles with a diameter of 4.2 microns.
  • The filtration and pressure drop measurements of both homogeneous and heterogeneous multi-layer fabric combinations agreed with the estimations from the layering model.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Thomas W. Bement, Ania Mitros, Rebecca Lau, Timothy A. Sipkens, Jocelyn Songer, Heidi Alexander, Devon Ostrom, Hamed Nikookar, Steven. N. Rogak

arXiv: 2202.03505v1 - DOI (physics.med-ph)
39 pages including supplemental information
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: This study explores nonwoven and woven fabrics to improve upon the performance of the widespread all-cotton mask, and examines the effect of layering, machine washing and drying on their filtration and breathability for submicron and supermicron particles. Individual materials were evaluated for their quality factor, Q, which combines filtration efficiency and breathability. Filtration was tested against particles 0.5 to 5 micron aerodynamic diameter. Nonwoven polyester and nonwoven polypropylene (craft fabrics, medical masks, and medical wraps) showed higher quality factors than woven materials (flannel cotton, Kona cotton, sateen cotton). Materials with meltblown nonwoven polypropylene filtered best, especially against submicron particles. Subsequently, we combined high performing fabrics into multi-layer sets, evaluating the sets quality factors before and after our washing protocol, which included machine washing, machine drying, and isopropanol soak. Sets incorporating meltblown nonwoven polypropylene designed for filtration (Filti and surgical mask) degraded significantly post-wash in the submicron range where they excelled prior to washing (Q = 57 and 79 at 1 micron, respectively, degraded to Q = 10 and 15 post-wash). Washing caused lesser quality degradation in sets incorporating spunbond non-woven polypropylene or medical wraps (Q = 12 to 24 pre-wash, Q = 8 to 10 post-wash). Post-wash quality factors are similar for all multi-layer sets in this study, and higher than Kona quilting cotton (Q = 6). Washed multi-layer sets filtered 12-42 percent of 0.5 micron, 27-76 percent of 1 micron, 58-96 percent of 2.8 micron, and 72-100 percent of 4.2 micron particles. The measured filtration and pressure drop of both the homogeneous and heterogeneous multi-layer fabric combinations agreed with the estimations from the layering model.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Feb. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2202.03505v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study investigated the effectiveness of nonwoven and woven fabrics in improving the performance of all-cotton masks. The researchers evaluated individual materials based on their quality factor (Q), which combines filtration efficiency and breathability, against particles with aerodynamic diameters ranging from 0.5 to 5 microns. Nonwoven polyester and nonwoven polypropylene demonstrated higher quality factors than woven materials such as flannel cotton, Kona cotton, and sateen cotton. Materials with meltblown nonwoven polypropylene were found to filter best, particularly against submicron particles. The researchers then combined high-performing fabrics into multi-layer sets and evaluated their quality factors before and after a washing protocol that included machine washing, machine drying, and isopropanol soak. Sets incorporating meltblown nonwoven polypropylene designed for filtration degraded significantly post-wash in the submicron range where they excelled prior to washing. Washing caused lesser quality degradation in sets incorporating spunbond non-woven polypropylene or medical wraps. Post-wash quality factors were similar for all multi-layer sets in this study but higher than Kona quilting cotton. Washed multi-layer sets filtered between 12-42 percent of particles with a diameter of 0.5 microns, between 27-76 percent of particles with a diameter of one micron, between 58-96 percent of particles with a diameter of 2.8 microns, and between 72-100 percent of particles with a diameter of 4.2 microns. The filtration and pressure drop measurements of both homogeneous and heterogeneous multi-layer fabric combinations agreed with the estimations from the layering model. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different fabrics in improving mask performance and highlights the importance of considering washing protocols when evaluating their efficacy.
Created on 10 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.