An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok

AI-generated keywords: TikTok Personalization Factors Algorithm User Experience Digital Spaces

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study by Maximilian Boeker and Aleksandra Urman on personalization factors on TikTok
  • Importance of TikTok's recommendation system for its success
  • Use of sock-puppet audit methodology and custom algorithm in the study
  • Factors tested: language and location settings, user interactions (follows, likes), viewing duration
  • Findings: all tested factors impact recommended content, follow-feature has strongest influence
  • Discussion on filter bubbles formation and problematic content proliferation
  • Implications for understanding personalization factors in social media user experiences
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Maximilian Boeker, Aleksandra Urman

Accepted for publication at the Web Conference 2022
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: TikTok currently is the fastest growing social media platform with over 1 billion active monthly users of which the majority is from generation Z. Arguably, its most important success driver is its recommendation system. Despite the importance of TikTok's algorithm to the platform's success and content distribution, little work has been done on the empirical analysis of the algorithm. Our work lays the foundation to fill this research gap. Using a sock-puppet audit methodology with a custom algorithm developed by us, we tested and analysed the effect of the language and location used to access TikTok, follow- and like-feature, as well as how the recommended content changes as a user watches certain posts longer than others. We provide evidence that all the tested factors influence the content recommended to TikTok users. Further, we identified that the follow-feature has the strongest influence, followed by the like-feature and video view rate. We also discuss the implications of our findings in the context of the formation of filter bubbles on TikTok and the proliferation of problematic content.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Jan. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2201.12271v1

In their study titled "An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok," Maximilian Boeker and Aleksandra Urman delve into the impact of various personalization factors on the content recommended to users on the popular social media platform. With over 1 billion active monthly users, predominantly from Generation Z, TikTok's recommendation system plays a crucial role in driving its success. However, there has been a lack of empirical analysis concerning TikTok's algorithm. Boeker and Urman aim to bridge this research gap by employing a sock-puppet audit methodology along with a custom algorithm they developed. Through their testing and analysis, they explore how factors such as language and location settings, user interactions like follows and likes, as well as viewing duration of specific posts influence the content suggested to TikTok users. Their findings reveal that all tested factors have an impact on the recommended content, with the follow-feature exerting the strongest influence followed by likes and video view rates. The authors also discuss the implications of their research in relation to filter bubbles formation on TikTok and potential issues surrounding problematic content proliferation. This study not only sheds light on the inner workings of TikTok's recommendation system but also underscores the importance of understanding personalization factors in shaping user experiences on social media platforms. Boeker and Urman's work sets a foundation for further exploration into algorithmic influences on content distribution and user engagement within digital spaces like TikTok.
Created on 13 May. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.