The emptiness inside: Finding gaps, valleys, and lacunae with geometric data analysis

AI-generated keywords: Gaps Data Analysis Astrophysics Valleys Lacunae

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Gaps in data are crucial in astrophysics research
  • Gaps can take various forms, such as kinematic gaps or rare exoplanets with specific radii
  • Gaps represent anomalous regions compared to their surroundings
  • Identifying and characterizing gaps can be challenging, especially when they have non-trivial shapes
  • The authors present a methodological approach to identify critical points and select the most relevant ones to trace the "valleys" in the density field
  • They propose a novel gappiness criterion based on observed properties of critical points that can be computed at any point in the data space
  • This allows for identifying a broader variety of gaps by highlighting regions of the data-space that are "gappy"
  • The authors explore methodological ways to make detected gaps robust to changes in density estimation and noise in the data
  • The methodology is applied to velocity distribution of nearby stars in Milky Way disk plane, which exhibits gaps that could originate from different processes
  • Identifying and characterizing these gaps could help determine their origins
  • Geometric data analysis can be used to find and characterize gaps, valleys, and lacunae within complex datasets
  • Proposed methodology provides a powerful tool for identifying anomalous regions within large datasets with broad applications beyond astrophysics research.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Gabriella Contardo, David W. Hogg, Jason A. S. Hunt, Joshua E. G. Peek, Yen-Chi Chen

arXiv: 2201.10674v1 - DOI (astro-ph.IM)
16 pages, 10 figures. Submitted to AJ. Comments welcomed

Abstract: Discoveries of gaps in data have been important in astrophysics. For example, there are kinematic gaps opened by resonances in dynamical systems, or exoplanets of a certain radius that are empirically rare. A gap in a data set is a kind of anomaly, but in an unusual sense: Instead of being a single outlier data point, situated far from other data points, it is a region of the space, or a set of points, that is anomalous compared to its surroundings. Gaps are both interesting and hard to find and characterize, especially when they have non-trivial shapes. We present methods to address this problem. First, we present a methodological approach to identify critical points, a criterion to select the most relevant ones and use those to trace the `valleys' in the density field. We then build on the observed properties of critical points to propose a novel gappiness criterion that can be computed at any point in the data space. This allows us to identify a broader variety of gaps, either by highlighting regions of the data-space that are `gappy' or by selecting data points that lie in local under densities. We also explore methodological ways to make the detected gaps robust to changes in the density estimation and noise in the data. We illustrate our methods on the velocity distribution of nearby stars in the Milky Way disk plane, which exhibits gaps that could originate from different processes. Identifying and characterizing those gaps could help determine their origins.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Jan. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2201.10674v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The discovery of gaps in data has been a crucial aspect of astrophysics research. These gaps can take various forms, such as kinematic gaps opened by resonances in dynamical systems or exoplanets with a specific radius that are empirically rare. Unlike traditional anomalies, which are single outlier data points far from other data points, gaps represent regions or sets of points that are anomalous compared to their surroundings. Identifying and characterizing these gaps can be challenging, particularly when they have non-trivial shapes. To address this problem, the authors present a methodological approach to identify critical points and select the most relevant ones to trace the "valleys" in the density field. They then propose a novel gappiness criterion based on the observed properties of critical points that can be computed at any point in the data space. This allows for identifying a broader variety of gaps by highlighting regions of the data-space that are "gappy" or selecting data points that lie in local under densities. The authors also explore methodological ways to make the detected gaps robust to changes in density estimation and noise in the data. To illustrate their methods, they apply them to the velocity distribution of nearby stars in the Milky Way disk plane, which exhibits gaps that could originate from different processes. Identifying and characterizing these gaps could help determine their origins. Overall, this study demonstrates how geometric data analysis can be used to find and characterize gaps, valleys, and lacunae within complex datasets. The proposed methodology provides a powerful tool for identifying anomalous regions within large datasets and has broad applications beyond astrophysics research.
Created on 17 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.