Fuel consumption elasticities, rebound effect and feebate effectiveness in the Indian and Chinese new car markets
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- China and India are large automotive markets and carbon emitters
- Both countries have considered policy levers to reduce carbon emissions from passenger cars
- Study aims to estimate responsiveness of new car buyers in China and India to policy levers affecting fuel prices, car prices, and fuel economy
- Joint discrete-continuous model of car choice and usage developed based on revealed preference survey data from approximately 8,000 new car buyers who purchased cars in 2016-17 in both countries
- Fuel consumption in both markets is relatively unresponsive to fuel price and income, with magnitudes of elasticity estimates ranging from 0.12 to 0.15
- Mean segment-level direct elasticities of fuel consumption relative to car price and fuel economy range from 0.57 to 0.65
- Rebound effect on fuel savings due to cost-free fuel economy improvement is found to be 17.1% for India and 18.8% for China
- Revenue-neutral feebate policy with average rebates and fees of up to around 15% of the retail price resulted in fuel savings of around 0.7% for both markets
- Feebate policy's rebound effect is low - at only 7.3% for India and 1.6% for China - it does not appear to be an effective fuel conservation policy
Authors: Prateek Bansal, Rubal Dua
Abstract: China and India, the world's two most populous developing economies, are also among the world's largest automotive markets and carbon emitters. To reduce carbon emissions from the passenger car sector, both countries have considered various policy levers affecting fuel prices, car prices and fuel economy. This study estimates the responsiveness of new car buyers in China and India to such policy levers and drivers including income. Furthermore, we estimate the potential for rebound effect and the effectiveness of a feebate policy. To accomplish this, we developed a joint discrete-continuous model of car choice and usage based on revealed preference survey data from approximately 8000 new car buyers from India and China who purchased cars in 2016-17. Conditional on buying a new car, the fuel consumption in both markets is found to be relatively unresponsive to fuel price and income, with magnitudes of elasticity estimates ranging from 0.12 to 0.15. For both markets, the mean segment-level direct elasticities of fuel consumption relative to car price and fuel economy range from 0.57 to 0.65. The rebound effect on fuel savings due to cost-free fuel economy improvement is found to be 17.1% for India and 18.8% for China. A revenue-neutral feebate policy, with average rebates and fees of up to around 15% of the retail price, resulted in fuel savings of around 0.7% for both markets. While the feebate policy's rebound effect is low - 7.3% for India and 1.6% for China - it does not appear to be an effective fuel conservation policy.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.