A ConvNet for the 2020s

AI-generated keywords: ConvNets Transformers ConvNeXt Vision Tasks Training Techniques

AI-generated Key Points

Vision Transformers (ViTs) have become the state-of-the-art image classification model, surpassing Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets).
ViTs face challenges when applied to general computer vision tasks such as object detection and semantic segmentation.
Hierarchical Transformers, such as Swin Transformers, reintroduced several ConvNet priors, making Transformers practically viable as a generic vision backbone and demonstrating remarkable performance on a wide variety of vision tasks.
A new study challenges the belief that the effectiveness of hybrid approaches is largely credited to the intrinsic superiority of Transformers rather than the inherent inductive biases of convolutions.
The study introduces a family of pure ConvNet models dubbed ConvNeXt that compete favorably with Transformers in terms of accuracy and scalability while maintaining simplicity and efficiency.
The researchers challenge common beliefs about convolution's importance in computer vision by modernizing ResNets towards Vision Transformer designs without introducing any new modules or architectural decisions beyond those used in traditional CNNs.
Modern training techniques such as AdamW optimizer, data augmentation techniques, and regularization schemes significantly enhance the performance of a simple ResNet-50 model.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Zhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer, Trevor Darrell, Saining Xie

arXiv: 2201.03545v2 - DOI (cs.CV)

CVPR 2022; Code: https://github.com/facebookresearch/ConvNeXt

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The "Roaring 20s" of visual recognition began with the introduction of Vision Transformers (ViTs), which quickly superseded ConvNets as the state-of-the-art image classification model. A vanilla ViT, on the other hand, faces difficulties when applied to general computer vision tasks such as object detection and semantic segmentation. It is the hierarchical Transformers (e.g., Swin Transformers) that reintroduced several ConvNet priors, making Transformers practically viable as a generic vision backbone and demonstrating remarkable performance on a wide variety of vision tasks. However, the effectiveness of such hybrid approaches is still largely credited to the intrinsic superiority of Transformers, rather than the inherent inductive biases of convolutions. In this work, we reexamine the design spaces and test the limits of what a pure ConvNet can achieve. We gradually "modernize" a standard ResNet toward the design of a vision Transformer, and discover several key components that contribute to the performance difference along the way. The outcome of this exploration is a family of pure ConvNet models dubbed ConvNeXt. Constructed entirely from standard ConvNet modules, ConvNeXts compete favorably with Transformers in terms of accuracy and scalability, achieving 87.8% ImageNet top-1 accuracy and outperforming Swin Transformers on COCO detection and ADE20K segmentation, while maintaining the simplicity and efficiency of standard ConvNets.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Jan. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2201.03545v2

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In recent years, Vision Transformers (ViTs) have emerged as the state-of-the-art image classification model, surpassing Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets). However, ViTs face challenges when applied to general computer vision tasks such as object detection and semantic segmentation. Hierarchical Transformers, such as Swin Transformers, reintroduced several ConvNet priors, making Transformers practically viable as a generic vision backbone and demonstrating remarkable performance on a wide variety of vision tasks. While the effectiveness of these hybrid approaches is largely credited to the intrinsic superiority of Transformers, rather than the inherent inductive biases of convolutions, a new study challenges this belief. In "A ConvNet for the 2020s," researchers reexamine the design spaces and test the limits of what a pure ConvNet can achieve. They gradually "modernize" a standard ResNet toward the design of a vision Transformer and discover several key components that contribute to the performance difference along the way. The outcome of this exploration is a family of pure ConvNet models dubbed ConvNeXt. Constructed entirely from standard ConvNet modules, ConvNeXts compete favorably with Transformers in terms of accuracy and scalability. They achieve 87.8% ImageNet top-1 accuracy and outperform Swin Transformers on COCO detection and ADE20K segmentation while maintaining the simplicity and efficiency of standard ConvNets. The study provides a trajectory going from ResNets to a ConvNet that bears resemblance to Transformers. The explorations investigate different levels of designs from Swin Transformer while maintaining network simplicity as a standard ConvNet. The conclusions for higher capacity models are consistent with those presented for ResNet-50/Swin-T complexity models. The researchers also challenge common beliefs about convolution's importance in computer vision by modernizing ResNets towards Vision Transformer designs without introducing any new modules or architectural decisions beyond those used in traditional CNNs. By using modern training techniques such as the AdamW optimizer, data augmentation techniques, and regularization schemes, they significantly enhance the performance of a simple ResNet-50 model. This enhanced training recipe increased the ResNet-50 model's performance from 76.1% to 78.8%, implying that a significant portion of the performance difference between traditional ConvNets and Vision Transformers may be due to training techniques. Overall, this study provides new observations and discussions that challenge common beliefs about convolution's importance in computer vision.

- Vision Transformers (ViTs) have become the state-of-the-art image classification model, surpassing Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets).
- ViTs face challenges when applied to general computer vision tasks such as object detection and semantic segmentation.
- Hierarchical Transformers, such as Swin Transformers, reintroduced several ConvNet priors, making Transformers practically viable as a generic vision backbone and demonstrating remarkable performance on a wide variety of vision tasks.
- A new study challenges the belief that the effectiveness of hybrid approaches is largely credited to the intrinsic superiority of Transformers rather than the inherent inductive biases of convolutions.
- The study introduces a family of pure ConvNet models dubbed ConvNeXt that compete favorably with Transformers in terms of accuracy and scalability while maintaining simplicity and efficiency.
- The researchers challenge common beliefs about convolution's importance in computer vision by modernizing ResNets towards Vision Transformer designs without introducing any new modules or architectural decisions beyond those used in traditional CNNs.
- Modern training techniques such as AdamW optimizer, data augmentation techniques, and regularization schemes significantly enhance the performance of a simple ResNet-50 model.

1. There are new computer programs called Vision Transformers that are really good at recognizing pictures. 2. These Vision Transformers have trouble with other tasks like finding objects and labeling parts of a picture. 3. A new type of program called Swin Transformers combines the best parts of both Vision Transformers and older programs called Convolutional Neural Networks to do many different tasks well. 4. Some people thought that the success of these hybrid programs was because of the Vision Transformer part, but a new study shows that Convolutional Neural Networks are still important. 5. The study also found a way to make traditional Convolutional Neural Network models work just as well as Vision Transformers. Definitions- Image classification: figuring out what is in a picture - Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets): an older type of computer program used for image recognition - Object detection: finding specific things in a picture - Semantic segmentation: labeling different parts of a picture with different names or categories - Hybrid approaches: combining different types of computer programs to get better results - Inductive biases: assumptions or preferences built into a computer program's design - Optimizer: a tool used to improve how well a computer program works - Data augmentation techniques: ways to change pictures slightly so that the computer can learn more from them - Regularization schemes: methods for preventing overfitting, which is when the computer gets too good at recognizing specific pictures but not others

Exploring the Limits of ConvNets: A Study on Modernizing ResNets Towards Vision Transformers

In recent years, Vision Transformers (ViTs) have become the state-of-the-art image classification model, surpassing Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets). However, ViTs face challenges when applied to general computer vision tasks such as object detection and semantic segmentation. To address this issue, hierarchical transformers such as Swin Transformers have been introduced to reintroduce several convnet priors and make transformers practically viable as a generic vision backbone. While these hybrid approaches are credited with the intrinsic superiority of transformers rather than the inherent inductive biases of convolutions, a new study challenges this belief. In "A ConvNet for the 2020s," researchers reexamine the design spaces and test the limits of what a pure ConvNet can achieve. The outcome of their exploration is a family of pure ConvNet models dubbed ConvNeXt which compete favorably with ViTs in terms of accuracy and scalability while maintaining simplicity and efficiency that traditional CNNs offer. In this article we will explore how they modernized ResNets towards Vision Transformer designs without introducing any new modules or architectural decisions beyond those used in traditional CNNs.

From ResNets to Vision Transformers

The researchers gradually "modernize" a standard ResNet towards the design of a vision Transformer by investigating different levels of designs from Swin Transformer while maintaining network simplicity as a standard ConvNet. They also challenge common beliefs about convolution's importance in computer vision by modernizing ResNets towards Vision Transformer designs without introducing any new modules or architectural decisions beyond those used in traditional CNNs.

Enhancing Performance Through Training Techniques

By using modern training techniques such as AdamW optimizer, data augmentation techniques, and regularization schemes, they significantly enhance performance even further than what was achieved through modernization alone. This enhanced training recipe increased performance from 76.1% to 78.8%, implying that much of difference between traditional convnets and vision transformers may be due to training techniques rather than architecture itself..

Conclusion

This study provides new observations and discussions that challenge common beliefs about convolution's importance in computer vision by demonstrating that it is possible to construct an entirely convnet based model which performs similarly or better than transformer architectures on various computer vision tasks including image classification, object detection and semantic segmentation while still maintaining network simplicity as standard convnets do . Furthermore , it shows that much improvement can be achieved through proper training techniques rather than relying solely on architecture changes .

Created on 07 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

62.4%

SIFT: Sparse Iso-FLOP Transformations for Maximizing Training Efficiency

cs.LG

57.6%

Astronomical image time series classification using CONVolutional attENTION (…

astro-ph.IM

56.0%

Focal Plane Wavefront Sensing using Machine Learning: Performance of Convolut…

astro-ph.IM

54.6%

A Little Bit Attention Is All You Need for Person Re-Identification

cs.RO

53.8%

Multimodal Contrastive Learning with LIMoE: the Language-Image Mixture of Exp…

cs.CV

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.