Associational and plausible causal effects of COVID-19 public health policies on economic and mental distress

AI-generated keywords: COVID-19

AI-generated Key Points

  • COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant mental distress globally
  • High proportions of people reporting anxiety and depression
  • Understanding factors contributing to distress is crucial for developing effective strategies
  • Study used data from Household Pulse Survey (HPS) to examine mental distress in US citizens
  • Combined HPS survey data with state-level COVID-19 cases, deaths, public policies, and mobility patterns
  • Constructed economic and mental distress measures to estimate structural models
  • Findings revealed steady increase in anxiety and depression in the US during study period
  • Mobility restrictions primarily impacted public health policies, leading to negative consequences for businesses and restaurants
  • Increase in COVID-19 cases resulted in 4.1% job loss and 6.3% economic distress during the same period
  • Job loss and housing insecurity significantly contributed to mental distress
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Reka Sundaram-Stukel, Richard J Davidson

Pages 8, figures 2 in main text
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Background The COVID-19 pandemic has increased mental distress globally. The proportion of people reporting anxiety is 26%, and depression is 34% points. Disentangling associational and causal contributions of behavior, COVID-19 cases, and economic distress on mental distress will dictate different mitigation strategies to reduce long-term pandemic-related mental distress. Methods We use the Household Pulse Survey (HPS) April 2020 to February 2021 data to examine mental distress among U.S. citizens attributable to COVID-19. We combined HPS survey data with publicly available state-level weekly: COVID-19 case and death data from the Centers for Disease Control, public policies, and Apple and Google mobility data. Finally, we constructed economic and mental distress measures to estimate structural models with lag dependent variables to tease out public health policies' associational and causal path coefficients on economic and mental distress. Findings From April 2020 to February 2021, we found that anxiety and depression had steadily climbed in the U.S. By design, mobility restrictions primarily affected public health policies where businesses and restaurants absorbed the biggest hit. Period t-1 COVID-19 cases increased job loss by 4.1% and economic distress by 6.3% points in the same period. Job-loss and housing insecurity in t-1 increased period t mental distress by 29.1% and 32.7%, respectively. However, t-1 food insecurity decreased mental distress by 4.9% in time t. The pandemic-related potential causal path coefficient of period t-1 economic distress on period t depression is 57.8%, and anxiety is 55.9%. Thus, we show that period t-1 COVID-19 case information, behavior, and economic distress may be causally associated with pandemic related period t mental distress.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Dec. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.11564v1

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on mental distress globally, with high proportions of people reporting anxiety and depression. Understanding the factors that contribute to this distress is crucial for developing effective strategies to mitigate long-term pandemic-related mental health issues. In this study, the authors used data from the Household Pulse Survey (HPS) conducted between April 2020 and February 2021 to examine the mental distress experienced by U.S. citizens as a result of COVID-19. They combined the HPS survey data with publicly available state-level weekly data on COVID-19 cases and deaths from the Centers for Disease Control, as well as information on public policies and mobility patterns from Apple and Google. By constructing economic and mental distress measures, the researchers estimated structural models with lag dependent variables to analyze the associational and causal effects of public health policies on economic and mental distress. The findings revealed a steady increase in anxiety and depression in the U.S. during the study period. The study also highlighted how mobility restrictions primarily impacted public health policies, leading to significant negative consequences for businesses and restaurants. The analysis showed that an increase in COVID-19 cases during period t-1 resulted in a 4.1% increase in job loss and a 6.3% increase in economic distress during the same period. Furthermore, job loss and housing insecurity during period t-1 were found to significantly contribute to mental distress during period t, with increases of 29.1% and 32.7%, respectively.
Created on 23 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.