Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of LID Practices for the Sponge City Construction: A Case Study in Guangxi, China
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Sponge city construction is a new approach to urban stormwater management in China
- It uses Low Impact Development (LID) techniques to manage stormwater at the source
- LID techniques reduce urban flooding and non-point source pollution while promoting rainwater resource utilization
- Li Qian and colleagues developed an evaluation system using the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to quantify benefits of different combinations of LID units
- The evaluation system was applied to analyze five LID design scenarios for a sports center project in Guangxi, China with varying locations and sizes of bio-retention facilities, grassed swales, sunken green spaces, permeable pavement, and storage tanks
- The green scenario with 34.5% bio-retention facilities and 46.0% sunken green spaces had the best comprehensive performance in meeting requirements for 75% annual total runoff reduction while achieving good operation performance, rainwater utilization, landscape promotion, and ecological service functions.
- This optimal scenario was adopted for constructing the sports center project.
- The proposed evaluation system can be used not only for optimal selection but also for performance effect evaluation of LID practices in other sponge city projects.
- This study provides valuable insights into how LID techniques can be used effectively in sponge city construction projects to mitigate urban flooding while promoting sustainable water management practices.
Authors: Li Qian, Wang Feng, Yu Yang, Huang Zhengce, Li Mantao, Guan Yuntao
Abstract: Sponge city construction is a new concept of urban stormwater management, which can effectively relieve urban flooding, reduce non-point source pollution, and promote the usage of rainwater resources, often including the application of Low Impact Development (LID) techniques. Although 30 cities in China have been chosen to implement sponge city construction, there is a lack of a quantitative evaluation method to evaluate the environmental, economic, and social benefits of LID practices. This paper develops a comprehensive evaluation system to quantify the benefits of different combinations of LID units using the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The performance of five LID design scenarios with different locations and sizes of the bio-retention facility, the grassed swale, the sunken green space, the permeable pavement, and the storage tank were analyzed for a sports center project in Guangxi, China. Results indicated that the green scenario that contains 34.5% of bio-retention facilities and 46.0% of sunken green spaces had the best comprehensive performance regarding meeting the requirements of 75% annual total runoff reduction and the attainment of good operation performance, rainwater utilization, landscape promotion, and ecological service functions, mainly because they are micro-scale and decentralized facilities that can manage stormwater at the source through the natural process. The optimal scenario was adopted to construct the project, and the proposed evaluation system can also be applied to optimal selection and performance effect evaluation of LID practices in other sponge city projects.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.