WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback

AI-generated keywords: Question Answering GPT-3 Human Feedback ELI5 Imitation Learning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper presents a novel approach to fine-tune GPT-3 for answering long-form questions using a text-based web-browsing environment.
  • The model is able to search and navigate the web, making it more effective in providing accurate answers.
  • Humans can perform the task, enabling them to train models on the task using imitation learning and optimize answer quality with human feedback.
  • Models must collect references while browsing in support of their answers to make human evaluation of factual accuracy easier.
  • The authors' best model is obtained by fine-tuning GPT-3 using behavior cloning and then performing rejection sampling against a reward model trained to predict human preferences.
  • The authors' model's answers are preferred by humans 56% of the time compared to those provided by their human demonstrators and 69% of the time compared to the highest-voted answer from Reddit.
  • This innovative approach combines machine learning techniques with human feedback to achieve high performance levels.
  • It provides insights into how such algorithms can be used for natural language processing (NLP) and question-answering systems.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, Xu Jiang, Karl Cobbe, Tyna Eloundou, Gretchen Krueger, Kevin Button, Matthew Knight, Benjamin Chess, John Schulman

30 pages

Abstract: We fine-tune GPT-3 to answer long-form questions using a text-based web-browsing environment, which allows the model to search and navigate the web. By setting up the task so that it can be performed by humans, we are able to train models on the task using imitation learning, and then optimize answer quality with human feedback. To make human evaluation of factual accuracy easier, models must collect references while browsing in support of their answers. We train and evaluate our models on ELI5, a dataset of questions asked by Reddit users. Our best model is obtained by fine-tuning GPT-3 using behavior cloning, and then performing rejection sampling against a reward model trained to predict human preferences. This model's answers are preferred by humans 56% of the time to those of our human demonstrators, and 69% of the time to the highest-voted answer from Reddit.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Dec. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.09332v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback" presents a novel approach to fine-tune GPT-3 for answering long-form questions using a text-based web-browsing environment. This allows the model to search and navigate the web, making it more effective in providing accurate answers. The authors set up the task in such a way that it can be performed by humans, enabling them to train models on the task using imitation learning and optimize answer quality with human feedback. To make human evaluation of factual accuracy easier, models must collect references while browsing in support of their answers. The authors train and evaluate their models on ELI5, a dataset of questions asked by Reddit users. Their best model is obtained by fine-tuning GPT-3 using behavior cloning and then performing rejection sampling against a reward model trained to predict human preferences. The authors' model's answers are preferred by humans 56% of the time compared to those provided by their human demonstrators and 69% of the time compared to the highest-voted answer from Reddit. This innovative approach combines machine learning techniques with human feedback to achieve high performance levels. It provides insights into how such algorithms can be used for natural language processing (NLP) and question-answering systems. The study was conducted by Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, Xu Jiang, Karl Cobbe Tyna Eloundou Gretchen Krueger Kevin Button Matthew Knight Benjamin Chess John Schulman.
Created on 06 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.