Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey
AI-generated Key Points
- Natural language processing (NLP) models have achieved state-of-the-art performances and gained wide applications in recent years.
- It is important to ensure the safe deployment of these models in the real world by ensuring their robustness against unseen or challenging scenarios.
- Robustness has been separately explored in applications like vision and NLP with various definitions, evaluation methods, and mitigation strategies in multiple lines of research.
- The paper titled "Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey" aims to provide a unifying survey of how to define, measure, and improve robustness in NLP.
- The paper connects multiple definitions of robustness and unifies various lines of work on identifying robustness failures and evaluating models' robustness.
- Mitigation strategies presented are data-driven, model-driven, and inductive-prior based with a more systematic view of how to effectively improve robustness in NLP models.
- Open challenges that need further investigation include developing comprehensive benchmarks for evaluating model performance; transferability and validity of adversarial examples across different domains or tasks; creating a unified framework to evaluate and improve robustness across different NLP applications consistently; involving users or stakeholders in collecting a set of test cases where a system might perform well for the wrong reasons; understanding human perception processes better when it comes to NLP tasks; designing sanity tests; exploring connections between human-like linguistic generalization and NLP generalization.
- This survey provides valuable insights into the current state of research on robustness in NLP models.
Authors: Xuezhi Wang, Haohan Wang, Diyi Yang
Abstract: As NLP models achieved state-of-the-art performances over benchmarks and gained wide applications, it has been increasingly important to ensure the safe deployment of these models in the real world, e.g., making sure the models are robust against unseen or challenging scenarios. Despite robustness being an increasingly studied topic, it has been separately explored in applications like vision and NLP, with various definitions, evaluation and mitigation strategies in multiple lines of research. In this paper, we aim to provide a unifying survey of how to define, measure and improve robustness in NLP. We first connect multiple definitions of robustness, then unify various lines of work on identifying robustness failures and evaluating models' robustness. Correspondingly, we present mitigation strategies that are data-driven, model-driven, and inductive-prior-based, with a more systematic view of how to effectively improve robustness in NLP models. Finally, we conclude by outlining open challenges and future directions to motivate further research in this area.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.