Ethereum Emissions: A Bottom-up Estimate
AI-generated Key Points
- The Ethereum network is a distributed global network of computers that requires massive amounts of computational power to maintain.
- Previous studies on estimating the energy use and emissions of the Ethereum network have relied on top-down economic analysis and rough estimates of hardware efficiency and emissions factors.
- This study provides a bottom-up analysis that works from hashrate to an energy usage estimate, and from mining locations to an emissions factor estimate, combining these for an overall emissions estimate.
- The authors analyze the entire history of Proof-of-Work (PoW) Ethereum, from creation to the merge.
- The authors estimate that the Ethereum network has used between 42 TW h and 89 TW h with a best guess of 60 TW h since its inception in 2015.
- They also estimate emissions factors for popular regions where Ethereum is mined by guessing which region a block was mined in based on block metadata.
- The estimated emissions have increased over time due to an increase in hashing power and electricity consumption.
- Limitations include only estimating direct operational emissions from mining activities and not considering indirect or embodied emissions from manufacturing hardware or infrastructure.
- Comparing their results with previous studies, they found that their estimates were similar but slightly higher due to accounting for more factors such as datacenter overheads, hardware overheads, grid loss, etc.
- High prices may not be significantly changing the hardware mix as hashing efficiency has increased since 2020-04 at a similar rate to their trendline.
- Overall, this study provides valuable insights into understanding the environmental impact of PoW-based blockchain networks like Ethereum and highlights areas where further research can be done to better understand their environmental impact.
Authors: Kyle McDonald
Abstract: The Ethereum ecosystem was maintained by a distributed global network of computers that required massive amounts of computational power. Previous work on estimating the energy use and emissions of the Ethereum network has relied on top-down economic analysis and rough estimates of hardware efficiency and emissions factors. In this work we provide a bottom-up analysis that works from hashrate to an energy usage estimate, and from mining locations to an emissions factor estimate, and combines these for an overall emissions estimate. We analyze the entire history of PoW Ethereum, from creation to the merge.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.