True Few-Shot Learning with Prompts -- A Real-World Perspective
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors discuss the effectiveness of prompt-based approaches in few-shot learning
- Recent doubts raised about performance in a "true" few-shot setting without tuning on a development set
- Extensive study conducted on PET (Pattern Exploiting Training), combining textual instructions with example-based fine-tuning
- PET performs strongly in true few-shot setting without relying on a development set
- Key to PET's performance is its ability to handle multiple prompts intelligently
- PET achieves new state-of-the-art performance on RAFT tasks, comes close to matching non-expert humans for 7 out of 11 tasks
- Prompt-based learners like PET have exceptional capabilities in true few-shot learning scenarios
- Learning from instructions will play a crucial role in achieving human-like few-shot learning abilities
- Research provides valuable insights into potential of prompt-based approaches and their significance for advancing the field of few shot learning
- Prompt-based learners such as PET offer significant advantages over traditional methods in true few-shot settings without relying on labeled development or test sets
Authors: Timo Schick, Hinrich Schütze
Abstract: Prompt-based approaches are strong at few-shot learning. However, Perez et al. (2021) have recently cast doubt on their performance because they had difficulty getting good results in a "true" few-shot setting in which prompts and hyperparameters cannot be tuned on a dev set. In view of this, we conduct an extensive study of PET, a method that combines textual instructions with example-based finetuning. We show that, if correctly configured, PET performs strongly in a true few-shot setting, i.e., without a dev set. Crucial for this strong performance is PET's ability to intelligently handle multiple prompts. We then put our findings to a real-world test by running PET on RAFT, a benchmark of tasks taken directly from realistic NLP applications for which no labeled dev or test sets are available. PET achieves a new state of the art on RAFT and performs close to non-expert humans for 7 out of 11 tasks. These results demonstrate that prompt-based learners like PET excel at true few-shot learning and underpin our belief that learning from instructions will play an important role on the path towards human-like few-shot learning capabilities.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.