Exploring Explainable AI in the Financial Sector: Perspectives of Banks and Supervisory Authorities
AI-generated Key Points
- The study investigated the perspectives of supervisory authorities and regulated entities on the application of explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) in the financial sector.
- The research focused on three use cases: consumer credit, credit risk, and anti-money laundering.
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted at three banks and two supervisory authorities in the Netherlands to gather data.
- Regarding consumer credit, one bank used an AI system based on logistic regression to assess mortgages with traffic-light colors for middle office employees. Another bank supplemented its traditional loan approval system for consumer credit with an AI system that uses transactional data resulting in fewer defaults on loans.
- One supervisory authority monitors whether lenders comply with lending standards limiting loan amounts depending on their financial situation. Regardless of what an AI system indicates, banks must conform to these standards as they ensure that lending consumers are protected; however, within these standards banks might use AI systems to find cases their traditional systems would not give credit but determine as profitable for them which might not always be good for consumers.
- Overall findings indicate that there is a disparity between supervisory authorities and banks regarding desired scope of explainability of AI systems for investigated use cases; thus clear differentiation between technical AI (model) explainability requirements and explainability requirements of broader AI system in relation to applicable laws and regulations could benefit financial sector.
Authors: Ouren Kuiper, Martin van den Berg, Joost van der Burgt, Stefan Leijnen
Abstract: Explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) is seen as a solution to making AI systems less of a black box. It is essential to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability, which are especially paramount in the financial sector. The aim of this study was a preliminary investigation of the perspectives of supervisory authorities and regulated entities regarding the application of xAI in the fi-nancial sector. Three use cases (consumer credit, credit risk, and anti-money laundering) were examined using semi-structured interviews at three banks and two supervisory authorities in the Netherlands. We found that for the investigated use cases a disparity exists between supervisory authorities and banks regarding the desired scope of explainability of AI systems. We argue that the financial sector could benefit from clear differentiation between technical AI (model) ex-plainability requirements and explainability requirements of the broader AI system in relation to applicable laws and regulations.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.