Godot is not coming: when we will let innovations enter psychiatry?

AI-generated keywords: Diagnosis Depression Electrophysiological Signals Machine Learning Bayesian Inference

AI-generated Key Points

  • Current diagnostic practices in psychiatry do not rely on objective biophysical evidence
  • The recent pandemic has highlighted the need to address the rising number of mood disorders, particularly depression, in a more efficient way
  • Detection based on electrophysiological signals such as electroencephalogram and electrocardiogram-based methods can improve the diagnostic process
  • Electromagnetic stimulation such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been proven to ameliorate symptoms of depression
  • Physiological complexity studies and advanced statistical methods like machine learning and Bayesian inference approach can be used to connect these practices with explanations
  • Fractal and nonlinear measures can adequately quantify previously undetected changes in intrinsic dynamics of physiological systems providing the basis for early detection of depression
  • Early screening of cardiovascular risks in depression is advocated for
  • Innovations should enter psychiatry sooner rather than later since many other neuroimaging techniques have already been accepted into clinical practice over time while some still await approval even though they were discovered more than 50 years ago.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Milena B. Čukić

arXiv: 2110.12873v1 - DOI (q-bio.NC)
35 pages, 4 pictures
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Current diagnostic practice in psychiatry is not relying on objective biophysical evidence. Recent pandemic emphasized the need to address the rising number of mood disorders (in particular, depression) cases in a more efficient way. We are proposing several already developed practices that can help improve that diagnostic process: detection based on electrophysiological signals (both electroencephalogram and electrocardiogram based) that were shown to be accurate for clinical practice and several modalities of electromagnetic stimulation that were proven to ameliorate symptoms of depression. In this work, we are connecting the two with explanations coming from physiological complexity studies (and our own work) as well as advanced statistical methods like machine learning and the Bayesian inference approach. It is shown that fractal and nonlinear measures can adequately quantify previously undetected changes in intrinsic dynamics of physiological systems, providing the basis for early detection of depression. We are also advocating for early screening of cardiovascular risks in depression which is in connection to previously described decomplexification of the autonomous nervous system resulting in symptoms recognized clinically. All that said, additional information about the level of complexity can help clinicians make a better decisions in the therapeutic process, increase the overall effectiveness of the treatment, and finally increase the quality of life of the patient.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Oct. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2110.12873v1

In the field of psychiatry, current diagnostic practices do not rely on objective biophysical evidence. However, the recent pandemic has highlighted the need to address the rising number of mood disorders, particularly depression, in a more efficient way. To improve the diagnostic process, several already developed practices can be utilized. These include detection based on electrophysiological signals such as electroencephalogram and electrocardiogram-based methods that have been shown to be accurate for clinical practice. Additionally, various modalities of electromagnetic stimulation such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been proven to ameliorate symptoms of depression. In this work by Milena B. Čukić from the Institute for Technology of Knowledge at Complutense University in Madrid, Spain; General Physiology with Biophysics Dpt., School of Biology at Belgrade University in Belgrade, Republic of Serbia; and EGA B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands; these practices are connected with explanations coming from physiological complexity studies and advanced statistical methods like machine learning and Bayesian inference approach. Fractal and nonlinear measures can adequately quantify previously undetected changes in intrinsic dynamics of physiological systems providing the basis for early detection of depression. The author also advocates for early screening of cardiovascular risks in depression which is connected to previously described decomplexification of the autonomous nervous system resulting in clinically recognized symptoms. Additional information about the level of complexity can help clinicians make better decisions in the therapeutic process thereby increasing overall effectiveness treatment leading to an increase in quality life for patients. The author argues that innovations should enter psychiatry sooner rather than later since many other neuroimaging techniques have already been accepted into clinical practice over time while some still await approval even though they were discovered more than 50 years ago.
Created on 21 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.