The Early-type Stars from LAMOST survey: Atmospheric parameters

AI-generated keywords: Stellar Labels SLAM LAMOST Early-Type Stars Non-LTE TLUSTY

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Massive stars are important in astrophysical processes and understanding their physical properties is crucial for tracing their evolution.
  • Researchers used the data-driven technique Stellar Label Machine (SLAM) with non-LTE TLUSTY synthetic spectra as a training dataset to estimate atmospheric parameters of early-type stars observed by LAMOST.
  • Two consistency tests were applied to verify the accuracy of the machine learning method, and SLAM's results were compared with literature values for several objects having high-resolution spectra.
  • The study provides stellar labels for effective temperature ($T_\mathrm{eff}$), surface gravity ($\log{g}$), metallicity ([M/H]), and projected rotational velocity ($v\sin{i}$) for 3,931 and 578 early-type stars from LAMOST Low-Resolution Survey (LRS) and Medium-Resolution Survey (MRS), respectively.
  • The uncertainties of $T_\mathrm{eff}$, $\log{g}$, and $v\sin{i}$ are $\sigma(T_\mathrm{eff}) = 2185$ K, $\sigma(\log{g}) = 0.29$ dex, and $\sigma(v\sin{i}) = 11 \,\rm km\,s^{-1}$ for MRS observations. For LRS spectra, these uncertainties are $\sigma(T_\mathrm{eff}) = 1642$ K, $\sigma(\log{g}) = 0.25$ dex, and $\sigma(v\sin{i}) = 42 \,\rm km\,s^{-1}$.
  • LRS spectra better constrain parameters of $T_\mathrm{eff}$, $\log{g}$, and [M/H] due to their broad wavelength coverage. On the other hand, MRS spectra provide more accurate line profiles and thus better constrain $v \sin i$.
  • This study demonstrates the effectiveness of using SLAM with non-LTE TLUSTY synthetic spectra as a training dataset to estimate atmospheric parameters for early type stars observed by LAMOST.
  • The results provide valuable inputs for tracing the evolution of massive stars and understanding their physical properties.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: YanJun Guo, Bo Zhang, Chao Liu, Jiao Li, JiangDan Li, LuQian Wang, ZhiCun Liu, YongHui Hou, ZhanWen Han, XueFei Chen

arXiv: 2110.06246v1 - DOI (astro-ph.SR)

Abstract: Massive stars play key roles in many astrophysical processes. Deriving atmospheric parameters of massive stars is important to understand their physical properties and thus are key inputs to trace their evolution. Here we report our work on adopting the data-driven technique Stellar LAbel Machine ({\tt SLAM}) with the non-LTE TLUSTY synthetic spectra as the training dataset to estimate the stellar parameters of LAMOST optical spectra for early-type stars. We apply two consistency tests to verify this machine learning method and compare stellar labels given by {\tt SLAM} with that in literature for several objects having high-resolution spectra. We provide the stellar labels of effective temperature ($T_\mathrm{eff}$), surface gravity ($\log{g}$), metallicity ([M/H]), and projected rotational velocity ($v\sin{i}$) for 3,931 and 578 early-type stars from LAMOST Low-Resolution Survey (LAMOST-LRS) and Medium-Resolution Survey (LAMOST-MRS), respectively. To estimate the average statistical uncertainties of our results, we calculated the standard deviation between the predicted stellar label and the pre-labeled published values from the high-resolution spectra. The uncertainties of the four parameters are $\sigma(T_\mathrm{eff}) = 2,185 $K, $\sigma(\log{g}) = 0.29$ dex, and $\sigma(v\sin{i}) = 11\, \rm km\,s^{-1}$ for MRS, and $\sigma(T_\mathrm{eff}) = 1,642 $K, $\sigma(\log{g}) = 0.25$ dex, and $\sigma(v\sin{i}) = 42\, \rm km\,s^{-1}$ for LRS spectra, respectively. We notice that parameters of $T_\mathrm{eff}$, $\log{g}$ and [M/H] can be better constrained using LRS spectra rather than using MRS spectra, most likely due to their broad wavelength coverage, while $v\sin{i}$ is constrained better by MRS spectra than by LRS spectra, probably due to the relatively accurate line profiles of MRS spectra.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Oct. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2110.06246v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Massive stars play a crucial role in various astrophysical processes and understanding their physical properties is essential to trace their evolution. In this study, the researchers adopted the data-driven technique Stellar Label Machine (SLAM) with non-LTE TLUSTY synthetic spectra as the training dataset to estimate the atmospheric parameters of early-type stars observed by the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST). The team applied two consistency tests to verify the machine learning method's accuracy and compared SLAM's results with literature values for several objects having high-resolution spectra. The study provides stellar labels for effective temperature ($T_\mathrm{eff}$), surface gravity ($\log{g}$), metallicity ([M/H]), and projected rotational velocity ($v\sin{i}$) for 3,931 and 578 early-type stars from LAMOST Low-Resolution Survey (LRS) and Medium-Resolution Survey (MRS), respectively. To estimate the average statistical uncertainties of their results, they calculated the standard deviation between predicted stellar labels and pre-labeled published values from high-resolution spectra. The uncertainties of $T_\mathrm{eff}$, $\log{g}$, and $v\sin{i}$ are $\sigma(T_\mathrm{eff}) = 2185$ K, $\sigma(\log{g}) = 0.29$ dex, and $\sigma(v\sin{i}) = 11 \,\rm km\,s^{-1}$ for MRS observations. For LRS spectra, these uncertainties are $\sigma(T_\mathrm{eff}) = 1642$ K, $\sigma(\log{g}) = 0.25$ dex, and $\sigma(v\sin{i}) = 42 \,\rm km\,s^{-1}$. The researchers found that LRS spectra better constrain parameters of $T_\mathrm{eff}$, $\log{g}$, and [M/H] due to their broad wavelength coverage. On the other hand, MRS spectra provide more accurate line profiles and thus better constrain $v \sin i$. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of using SLAM with non-LTE TLUSTY synthetic spectra as a training dataset to estimate atmospheric parameters for early type stars observed by LAMOST. The results provide valuable inputs for tracing the evolution of massive stars and understanding their physical properties.
Created on 18 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.