Towards a systematic treatment of observational uncertainties in forward asteroseismic modelling of gravity-mode pulsators

AI-generated keywords: Asteroseismology Observational Uncertainties Gravity-Mode Pulsators Period Spacing Patterns Light Curve Extraction

AI-generated Key Points

  • Asteroseismology uses pulsation mode frequencies to determine a star's interior physics by comparing them with theoretical predictions.
  • Recent advances in numerical, theoretical, and statistical asteroseismic methods have renewed interest in investigating the propagation of observational uncertainties within a forward asteroseismic modelling framework.
  • The authors use a well-studied benchmark slowly pulsating B star, KIC 7760680, to investigate the sensitivity of forward asteroseismic modelling to various sources of observational uncertainty that affect the precision of input pulsation mode frequencies.
  • One of the largest sources of uncertainty in their benchmark star is in manually building period spacing patterns.
  • The inclusion of a potentially ambiguous pulsation mode frequency may yield differences in model parameters up to 10% for mass and age depending on the radial order of the mode.
  • Future asteroseismic studies should quantify and include observational uncertainties introduced by light curve extraction, iterative pre-whitening, and building period spacing patterns as these propagate into final modelling results.
  • This study emphasizes how important it is to consider all possible sources of error when conducting asteroseismic studies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Dominic M. Bowman, Mathias Michielsen

A&A 656, A158 (2021)
arXiv: 2109.10776v1 - DOI (astro-ph.SR)
21 pages, proposed for acceptance for publication in A&A
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Context. In asteroseismology the pulsation mode frequencies of a star are the fundamental data that are compared to theoretical predictions to determine a star's interior physics. Recent significant advances in the numerical, theoretical and statistical asteroseismic methods applied to main sequence stars with convective cores have renewed the interest in investigating the propagation of observational uncertainties within a forward asteroseismic modelling framework. Aims. We aim to quantify the impact of various choices made throughout the observational aspects of extracting pulsation mode frequencies in main sequence stars with gravity modes. Methods. We use a well-studied benchmark slowly pulsating B star, KIC 7760680, to investigate the sensitivity of forward asteroseismic modelling to various sources of observational uncertainty that affect the precision of the input pulsation mode frequencies. Results. We quantify the impact of the propagation of the observational uncertainties involved in forward asteroseismic modelling. We find that one of the largest sources of uncertainty in our benchmark star is in the manual building of period spacing patterns, such that the inclusion of a potentially ambiguous pulsation mode frequency may yield differences in model parameters of up to 10% for mass and age depending on the radial order of the mode. Conclusions. We conclude that future asteroseismic studies of main sequence stars with a convective core should quantify and include observational uncertainties introduced by the light curve extraction, iterative pre-whitening and the building of period spacing patterns, as these propagate into the final modelling results.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Sep. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2109.10776v1

This article focuses on the impact of observational uncertainties on forward asteroseismic modelling of gravity-mode pulsators. Asteroseismology uses pulsation mode frequencies to determine a star's interior physics by comparing them with theoretical predictions. Recent advances in numerical, theoretical, and statistical asteroseismic methods have renewed interest in investigating the propagation of observational uncertainties within a forward asteroseismic modelling framework. The authors use a well-studied benchmark slowly pulsating B star, KIC 7760680, to investigate the sensitivity of forward asteroseismic modelling to various sources of observational uncertainty that affect the precision of input pulsation mode frequencies. They aim to quantify the impact of various choices made throughout the observational aspects of extracting pulsation mode frequencies in main sequence stars with gravity modes. The study finds that one of the largest sources of uncertainty in their benchmark star is in manually building period spacing patterns. The inclusion of a potentially ambiguous pulsation mode frequency may yield differences in model parameters up to 10% for mass and age depending on the radial order of the mode. The authors conclude that future asteroseismic studies should quantify and include observational uncertainties introduced by light curve extraction, iterative pre-whitening, and building period spacing patterns as these propagate into final modelling results. The study highlights the importance of considering all possible sources of uncertainty when interpreting asteroseismic data. In addition to discussing their findings related to KIC 7760680, this article also provides detailed information about their methodology and results for constructing variant patterns and testing different scenarios. The authors present graphs and tables showing parameter probability distributions for each pattern tested. Overall, this study emphasizes how important it is to consider all possible sources of error when conducting asteroseismic studies. By quantifying these errors and including them in models, researchers can improve our understanding of stellar interiors while also increasing confidence in our results.
Created on 04 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.