Measuring and improving information systems agility through the balanced scorecard approach

AI-generated keywords: IS Agility BSC Balanced Scorecard Business Contribution User Orientation Operation Excellence

AI-generated Key Points

  • Agility is crucial for organizations to survive in today's complex and rapidly changing business environment
  • Information systems are seen as a key enabler of agility
  • A balanced-scorecard based framework called IS Agility BSC evaluates IS agility through four perspectives: business contribution, user orientation, operation excellence, and innovation and competitiveness
  • The proposed framework measures enterprise information systems' agility according to 14 key success factors over the four BSC perspectives using 42 agility evaluation criteria identified based on literature survey methodology
  • The IT balanced scorecard (BSC) approach is an appropriate technique for evaluating IT performance
  • The research methodology used involves conducting a literature review on existing frameworks related to IS agility measurement, identifying key success factors across four perspectives, and evaluating these factors using 42 evaluation criteria.
  • Measuring IS agility through a balanced perspective approach using the BSC framework can help organizations improve their agility and survive in today's rapidly changing business environment.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yassine Rdiouat, Samir Bahsani, Mouhsine Lakhdissi, Alami Semma

International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 2015, vol. 12, no 5, p. 58
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: Facing an environment increasingly complex, uncertain and changing, even in crisis, organizations are driven to be agile in order to survive. Agility, at the core heart of business strategy, represents the ability to grow in a competitive environment of continuous and unpredictable changes with information systems perceived as one of its main enablers. In other words, to be agile, organizations must be able to rely on agile enterprise information systems/information technology (IT/IS). Since, the agility needs are not the same among stakeholders, the objective of this research is to develop a conceptual model for the achievement and assessment of IT/IS agility from balanced perspectives to support agile organizations. Several researches have indicated that the IT balanced scorecard (BSC) approach is an appropriate technique for evaluating IT performance. This paper provides a balanced-scorecard based framework to evaluate the IS agility through four perspectives: business contribution, user orientation, operation excellence and innovation and competitiveness. The proposed framework, called IS Agility BSC, propose a three layer structure for each of the four perspectives: mission, key success factors, and agility evaluation criteria. According to this conceptual model, enterprise information systems agility is measured according to 14 agility key success factors, over the four BSC Perspectives, using 42 agility evaluation criteria that are identified based on literature survey methodology. This paper explores agility in the broader context of the enterprise information systems. The findings will provide, for both researchers and practitioners, a practical approach for achieving and measuring IS agility performance to support organizations in attempt to become agile as a new condition of surviving in the new business world.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Sep. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2109.07281v1

In today's complex and rapidly changing business environment, organizations must be agile to survive. Agility is at the core of business strategy and refers to an organization's ability to grow in a competitive environment of continuous and unpredictable changes. Information systems are perceived as one of the main enablers of agility, making it essential for organizations to rely on agile enterprise information systems/information technology (IT/IS). However, since the agility needs are not the same among stakeholders, there is a need for a conceptual model that can achieve and assess IT/IS agility from balanced perspectives to support agile organizations. This paper proposes a balanced-scorecard based framework called IS Agility BSC that evaluates IS agility through four perspectives: business contribution, user orientation, operation excellence, and innovation and competitiveness. The proposed framework has a three-layer structure for each perspective: mission, key success factors, and agility evaluation criteria. According to this conceptual model, enterprise information systems' agility is measured according to 14 key success factors over the four BSC perspectives using 42 agility evaluation criteria identified based on literature survey methodology. Several researches have indicated that the IT balanced scorecard (BSC) approach is an appropriate technique for evaluating IT performance. This paper explores agility in the broader context of enterprise information systems and provides both researchers and practitioners with a practical approach for achieving and measuring IS agility performance. The findings will help organizations become more agile as they strive to survive in today's new business world. The research methodology used in this study involves conducting a literature review on existing frameworks related to IS agility measurement. The authors then developed their own framework by identifying key success factors across four perspectives: business contribution, user orientation, operation excellence, and innovation and competitiveness. Finally, they evaluated these factors using 42 evaluation criteria. Overall, this paper highlights the importance of measuring IS agility through a balanced perspective approach using the BSC framework. It provides valuable insights into how organizations can improve their agility and survive in today's rapidly changing business environment.
Created on 14 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.