Analysis of Language Change in Collaborative Instruction Following

AI-generated keywords: Language Change Collaborative Instruction Language Complexity Reference Games Utility

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study investigates how language changes over time in a collaborative instructional task.
  • Previous research has found that language complexity decreases as conventions are established.
  • However, this study presents a contrasting finding - instructors who enhance instruction utility increase language complexity.
  • This increase in complexity allows instructors to better collaborate with increasingly skilled instruction followers.
  • The findings provide insights into how language evolves and adapts in collaborative instructional settings.
  • Understanding language complexity changes helps researchers understand effective communication and coordination in such contexts.
  • The study contributes to knowledge of language change in collaborative environments.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Anna Effenberger, Eva Yan, Rhia Singh, Alane Suhr, Yoav Artzi

Findings of EMNLP 2021 Short Paper

Abstract: We analyze language change over time in a collaborative, goal-oriented instructional task, where utility-maximizing participants form conventions and increase their expertise. Prior work studied such scenarios mostly in the context of reference games, and consistently found that language complexity is reduced along multiple dimensions, such as utterance length, as conventions are formed. In contrast, we find that, given the ability to increase instruction utility, instructors increase language complexity along these previously studied dimensions to better collaborate with increasingly skilled instruction followers.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Sep. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2109.04452v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study titled "Analysis of Language Change in Collaborative Instruction Following," authors Anna Effenberger, Eva Yan, Rhia Singh, Alane Suhr, and Yoav Artzi investigate how language changes over time in a collaborative instructional task. The goal of the task is for participants to maximize utility by forming conventions and increasing their expertise. Previous research has mainly focused on studying similar scenarios in the context of reference games and has consistently found that language complexity decreases as conventions are established, which is evidenced by shorter utterances. However, this study presents a contrasting finding. The researchers discover that instructors who have the ability to enhance instruction utility actually increase language complexity along the dimensions previously studied. This increase in complexity allows instructors to better collaborate with increasingly skilled instruction followers. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into how language evolves and adapts within collaborative instructional settings. By understanding how language complexity changes over time, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how individuals communicate and coordinate their actions effectively in such contexts. Overall, this study contributes to our knowledge of language change in collaborative environments and emphasizes the importance of considering different factors that influence linguistic behaviors.
Created on 07 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.