Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Vision-language pre-training as a promising method for representation learning
- Advantages of vision-language pre-training: broader source of supervision, ability to transfer knowledge through zero-shot learning
- Major challenge in deploying vision-language models: prompt engineering
- Prompt engineering requires domain expertise and significant time investment
- Slight changes in the prompt can have a significant impact on performance
- Different downstream tasks require specific prompt designs, complicating deployment process
- Proposed solution: context optimization (CoOp)
- CoOp models context in prompts using continuous representations and performs end-to-end learning while keeping pre-trained parameters fixed
- CoOp enables fully automated design of task-relevant prompts
- Experiments on 11 datasets show that CoOp transforms pre-trained vision-language models into data-efficient visual learners
- CoOp outperforms handcrafted prompts with as few as one or two shots, achieving significant improvements with more shots (e.g., 16 shots)
- CoOp exhibits strong robustness to distribution shift during deployment
- CoOp automates the prompt engineering process in vision-language models, enabling efficient deployment and impressive performance gains compared to handcrafted prompts across various datasets.
Authors: Kaiyang Zhou, Jingkang Yang, Chen Change Loy, Ziwei Liu
Abstract: Vision-language pre-training has recently emerged as a promising alternative for representation learning. It shifts from the tradition of using images and discrete labels for learning a fixed set of weights, seen as visual concepts, to aligning images and raw text for two separate encoders. Such a paradigm benefits from a broader source of supervision and allows zero-shot transfer to downstream tasks since visual concepts can be diametrically generated from natural language, known as prompt. In this paper, we identify that a major challenge of deploying such models in practice is prompt engineering. This is because designing a proper prompt, especially for context words surrounding a class name, requires domain expertise and typically takes a significant amount of time for words tuning since a slight change in wording could have a huge impact on performance. Moreover, different downstream tasks require specific designs, further hampering the efficiency of deployment. To overcome this challenge, we propose a novel approach named context optimization (CoOp). The main idea is to model context in prompts using continuous representations and perform end-to-end learning from data while keeping the pre-trained parameters fixed. In this way, the design of task-relevant prompts can be fully automated. Experiments on 11 datasets show that CoOp effectively turns pre-trained vision-language models into data-efficient visual learners, requiring as few as one or two shots to beat hand-crafted prompts with a decent margin and able to gain significant improvements when using more shots (e.g., at 16 shots the average gain is around 17% with the highest reaching over 50%). CoOp also exhibits strong robustness to distribution shift.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.