The Number of Steps Needed for Nonconvex Optimization of a Deep Learning Optimizer is a Rational Function of Batch Size

Authors: Hideaki Iiduka

Abstract: Recently, convergence as well as convergence rate analyses of deep learning optimizers for nonconvex optimization have been widely studied. Meanwhile, numerical evaluations for the optimizers have precisely clarified the relationship between batch size and the number of steps needed for training deep neural networks. The main contribution of this paper is to show theoretically that the number of steps needed for nonconvex optimization of each of the optimizers can be expressed as a rational function of batch size. Having these rational functions leads to two particularly important facts, which were validated numerically in previous studies. The first fact is that there exists an optimal batch size such that the number of steps needed for nonconvex optimization is minimized. This implies that using larger batch sizes than the optimal batch size does not decrease the number of steps needed for nonconvex optimization. The second fact is that the optimal batch size depends on the optimizer. In particular, it is shown theoretically that momentum and Adam-type optimizers can exploit larger optimal batches and further reduce the minimum number of steps needed for nonconvex optimization than can the stochastic gradient descent optimizer.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Aug. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2108.11713v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 10 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.