Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2108.10464v2

In the field of cluster job scheduling, accurately estimating job runtime properties is crucial for effective job scheduling. Traditional online cluster job schedulers rely on history-based learning, which uses past job execution information to estimate the runtime properties of newly arrived jobs. However, due to the rapid development in cluster technology and changing user inputs, job runtime properties can change over time, leading to inaccurate predictions. To address this issue, this paper proposes a task-sampling-based approach for real-time learning of job runtime properties. This approach involves proactively sampling and scheduling a small fraction of tasks from each job. By exploiting the similarity among the runtime properties of tasks within the same job, this approach is inherently immune to changing job behavior. The study focuses on two key questions: (1) Can learning in space (task-sampling-based learning) be more accurate than learning in time (history-based learning)? (2) If so, can delaying the scheduling of remaining tasks until the completion of sampled tasks compensate for this delay and result in improved job performance? Analytical and experimental analysis using three production traces with different skew and job distribution demonstrates that learning in space can significantly improve accuracy compared to history-based learning. Furthermore, simulation and testbed evaluation on Azure using three production cluster job traces show that despite its online overhead, learning in space reduces the average Job Completion Time (JCT) by 1.28x, 1.56x, and 1.32x compared to the prior-art history-based predictor. Overall, this research highlights the potential and limitations of real-time learning of job runtime properties through task-sampling-based approaches. It provides valuable insights into improving cluster job scheduling by leveraging similarities among task runtime properties within a job while adapting to changing environments.

• - Accurately estimating job runtime properties is crucial for effective job scheduling in cluster job scheduling.
• - Traditional online cluster job schedulers use history-based learning to estimate runtime properties, but this can lead to inaccurate predictions due to changing technology and user inputs.
• - The proposed approach is task-sampling-based, involving proactive sampling and scheduling of a small fraction of tasks from each job.
• - This approach exploits the similarity among task runtime properties within the same job, making it immune to changing job behavior.
• - The study focuses on two key questions: (1) Can learning in space be more accurate than learning in time? (2) Can delaying the scheduling of remaining tasks until the completion of sampled tasks improve job performance?
• - Analytical and experimental analysis demonstrate that learning in space significantly improves accuracy compared to history-based learning.
• - Simulation and testbed evaluation show that learning in space reduces average Job Completion Time (JCT) by 1.28x, 1.56x, and 1.32x compared to history-based predictors.
• - This research highlights the potential and limitations of real-time learning of job runtime properties through task-sampling-based approaches.
• - It provides valuable insights into improving cluster job scheduling by leveraging similarities among task runtime properties within a job while adapting to changing environments.

Key points1. It is important to estimate how long a job will take in order to schedule it effectively. 2. Traditional methods of estimating job runtime can be inaccurate because technology and user inputs change. 3. A new approach suggests sampling and scheduling a small number of tasks from each job to make better predictions. 4. This approach takes advantage of similarities between tasks in the same job, which helps even if the job changes. 5. The study asks two questions: Can learning about jobs by looking at similar ones be more accurate? Can delaying scheduling until some tasks are done improve performance? Definitions- Estimate: To make a guess about something based on available information. - Runtime: The amount of time it takes for something to happen or complete. - Scheduling: Deciding when different tasks or jobs will happen or be done. - Predictions: Guesses about what will happen in the future based on current information. - Proactive: Taking action before something happens instead of reacting afterwards.

Real-Time Learning of Job Runtime Properties: A Task-Sampling-Based Approach

Cluster job scheduling is a complex task that requires accurate estimation of job runtime properties. Traditional online cluster job schedulers rely on history-based learning, which uses past job execution information to estimate the runtime properties of newly arrived jobs. However, due to the rapid development in cluster technology and changing user inputs, this approach can lead to inaccurate predictions over time. To address this issue, researchers have proposed a task-sampling-based approach for real-time learning of job runtime properties.

Background

In order to improve accuracy and adaptability in cluster job scheduling, researchers sought out an alternative method for estimating job runtime properties that would be immune to changing environments and user inputs. The task-sampling based approach involves proactively sampling and scheduling a small fraction of tasks from each job before predicting the remaining tasks’ runtimes. This method leverages similarities among the runtime properties of tasks within the same jobs while adapting to changing environments.

Research Questions

The research focuses on two key questions: (1) Can learning in space (task-sampling based learning) be more accurate than learning in time (history based learning)? And (2) If so, can delaying the scheduling of remaining tasks until completion of sampled tasks compensate for this delay and result in improved performance?

Analytical Analysis & Experiments

To answer these questions, analytical analysis was conducted using three production traces with different skew and job distribution models. Results showed that compared to history based predictors, task sampling based approaches could significantly improve accuracy when estimating runtimes for new jobs arriving at clusters. Furthermore, simulation experiments were conducted on Azure using three production clusters with different workloads; results showed that despite its online overhead costs associated with sampling tasks from each new arrival job, task sampling reduced average Job Completion Time by 1.28x - 1.56x compared to prior art history based predictors .

Conclusion

Overall this research highlights potential benefits as well as limitations associated with real time learning through task sampling approaches when it comes to improving cluster jobs scheduling accuracy and efficiency . It provides valuable insights into leveraging similarities among task runtimes within a single job while adapting quickly changes environment or user input behavior over time .