The Mach-Zehnder Interferometer and Photon Dualism: with an Analysis of Nonlocality

AI-generated keywords: Wave-Particle Duality Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Entanglement Nonlocality Measurement Problem

AI-generated Key Points

  • The Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) is used to explore wave-particle duality.
  • The MZI shows that which-way information is incompatible with wave interference.
  • Wheeler's delayed choice experiment can be explained using the MZI.
  • A crucial question surrounding the MZI is how a photon can divide at the first beam splitter and yet terminate on either arm with its undiminished energy.
  • The position advanced is that the photon has two identities: one supporting particle features and the other wave features.
  • Photon kinetic energy resides in time and never diffracts in space; at reception, it always arrives whole and imitates particle impact without being a particle.
  • Acknowledging that the photon has two identities explains photon dual nature.
  • Wave-particle duality is central to quantum mechanics, understanding it leads to new insights into entanglement, nonlocality, and the measurement problem.
  • This paper by Paul A. Klevgard provides an analysis of nonlocality using the MZI as an example of how understanding wave-particle duality leads to new insights into quantum mechanics.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Paul A. Klevgard

arXiv: 2108.08222v1 - DOI (physics.gen-ph)
21 pages. Proc. SPIE 11481, Light in Nature VIII, 114810B (21 August 2020) Supporting video: https://youtu.be/A1Wabkr0YFE
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: The Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) is chosen to illustrate the long-standing wave particle duality problem. Why is which-way (welcher weg) information incompatible with wave interference? How to explain Wheeler's delayed choice experiment? Most crucially, how can the photon divide at the first beam splitter and yet terminate on either arm with its undiminished energy? The position advanced is that the photon has two identities, one supporting particle features and the other wave features. There is photon kinetic energy that never splits (on half-silvered mirrors) or diffracts (in pinholes or slits). Then there are photon probability waves that do diffract and can reinforce or cancel. Photon kinetic energy is oscillatory; its cycles require/occupy time. E = mc2 suggests that kinetic energy is physically real as occurrence in time just as rest mass is physically real as existence in space; both are quantized and both occupy/require a dimension for their occurrence or existence. Photon kinetic energy (KE) thus resides in time, but is still present/available for interactions (events) in space; rest mass (e.g., your desk) resides in space but is still present/available for interactions (events) in time. While photon probability waves progress in space and diffract there, photon KE resides in time and never diffracts in space; at reception it always arrives whole and imitates particle impact without being a particle. Photon probability waves are real; they diffract in space. Acknowledging that the photon has two identities (residing energy and progressing probability), explains photon dual nature. And wave-particle duality is central to quantum mechanics. Understanding it leads to new insights into entanglement, nonlocality and the measurement problem. Supporting video: https://youtu.be/A1Wabkr0YFE

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Jul. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2108.08222v1

The Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) has been a key tool in exploring the long-standing wave-particle duality problem. This dilemma was first highlighted by Max Planck and later explored by Albert Einstein, who wrote extensively on quantum problems. The MZI is used to illustrate why which-way information, or "welcher weg," is incompatible with wave interference and how Wheeler's delayed choice experiment can be explained. One of the most crucial questions surrounding the MZI is how a photon can divide at the first beam splitter and yet terminate on either arm with its undiminished energy. The position advanced is that the photon has two identities: one supporting particle features and the other wave features. There is photon kinetic energy that never splits or diffracts, while there are also photon probability waves that do diffract and can reinforce or cancel each other out. Photon kinetic energy is oscillatory, meaning its cycles require time for their occurrence. This suggests that kinetic energy is physically real as an occurrence in time just as rest mass is physically real as existence in space; both are quantized and both occupy a dimension for their occurrence or existence. Photon kinetic energy thus resides in time but remains present/available for interactions (events) in space, while rest mass resides in space but remains present/available for interactions (events) in time. While photon probability waves progress in space and diffract there, photon KE resides in time and never diffracts in space; at reception it always arrives whole and imitates particle impact without being a particle. Acknowledging that the photon has two identities (residing energy and progressing probability), explains photon dual nature. Wave-particle duality is central to quantum mechanics, understanding it leads to new insights into entanglement, nonlocality, and the measurement problem. This paper by Paul A. Klevgard provides an analysis of nonlocality using the MZI as an example of how understanding wave-particle duality leads to new insights into quantum mechanics. It explores how acknowledging two identities for dual attributes helps explain phenomena such as entanglement and nonlocality within quantum mechanics.
Created on 23 Mar. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.