## Properties of Invariant Set Theory

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- J.R. Hance, S. Hossenfelder, and T.N. Palmer respond to a critique by Sen on Invariant Set Theory (IST)
- Sen claimed that IST is unlikely to solve the puzzle posed by Bell correlations and is neither local nor $\psi$-epistemic
- The authors point out inaccuracies in Sen's arguments, notably that the hidden-variable model of quantum physics he uses to critique IST bears no relation to IST itself
- IST is a deterministic theory based on classical mechanics and topology which proposes a new interpretation of quantum mechanics without violating locality or realism
- According to IST, particles are not point-like objects but rather continuous fields defined over an invariant set in spacetime
- The authors argue that while IST does not rely on wave functions as fundamental entities, it can still reproduce all the predictions of standard quantum mechanics through its own mathematical formalism

**Authors:**
J. R. Hance,
S. Hossenfelder,
T. N. Palmer

**Abstract:** In a recent paper (arXiv:2107.04761), Sen critiques a superdeterministic model of quantum physics, Invariant Set Theory, proposed by one of the authors. He concludes that superdeterminism is `unlikely to solve the puzzle posed by the Bell correlations'. He also claims that the model is neither local nor $\psi$-epistemic. We here detail multiple inaccuracies with Sen's arguments - notably that the hidden-variable model of quantum physics he uses to critique Invariant Set Theory bares no relation to Invariant Set Theory - and use this opportunity to lay out the properties of Invariant Set Theory as clearly as possible.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.