Star Formation Histories of Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxies: environmental differences between Magellanic and non-Magellanic satellites?
AI-generated Key Points
- The study presents color-magnitude diagrams and star formation histories of seven ultra-faint dwarf galaxies.
- Each galaxy created at least 80% of its stellar mass by $z\sim6$.
- All galaxies show quenching times older than 11.5 Gyr ago, consistent with reionization suppressing the star formation of small dark matter halos.
- Differences in the SFHs of candidate Magellanic Cloud satellites compared to other Milky Way satellites suggest that Magellanic satellites show quenching times about 600 Myr more recent on average than those of other Milky Way satellites.
- This research provides insight into how environment and reionization can impact low-mass galaxies such as these ultra-faint dwarf galaxies.
- The observations presented here will be an important baseline for follow-up imaging with HST and the James Webb Space Telescope to measure both bulk PMs and internal motions as well as spectroscopic surveys to improve metallicity constraints for more precise age derivations on these very interesting galaxies.
- The study was associated with the HST Treasury Program 14734 (PI Kallivayalil), supported by NASA through grants from the Space Telescope Science Institute.
- AW received support from NASA ATP grants 80NSSC18K1097 and 80NSSC20K0513, a Scialog Award from the Heising-Simons Foundation, and a Hellman Fellowship.
- ENK gratefully acknowledges support from a Cottrell Scholar award administered by the Research Corporation for Science Advancement.
Authors: Elena Sacchi, Hannah Richstein, Nitya Kallivayalil, Roeland van der Marel, Mattia Libralato, Paul Zivick, Gurtina Besla, Thomas M. Brown, Yumi Choi, Alis Deason, Tobias Fritz, Marla Geha, Puragra Guhathakurta, Myoungwon Jeon, Evan Kirby, Steven R. Majewski, Ekta Patel, Joshua D. Simon, Sangmo Tony Sohn, Erik Tollerud, Andrew Wetzel
Abstract: We present the color-magnitude diagrams and star formation histories (SFHs) of seven ultra-faint dwarf galaxies: Horologium 1, Hydra 2, Phoenix 2, Reticulum 2, Sagittarius 2, Triangulum 2, and Tucana 2, derived from high-precision Hubble Space Telescope photometry. We find that the SFH of each galaxy is consistent with them having created at least 80% of the stellar mass by $z\sim6$. For all galaxies, we find quenching times older than 11.5 Gyr ago, compatible with the scenario in which reionization suppresses the star formation of small dark matter halos. However, our analysis also reveals some differences in the SFHs of candidate Magellanic Cloud satellites, i.e., galaxies that are likely satellites of the Large Magellanic Cloud and that entered the Milky Way potential only recently. Indeed, Magellanic satellites show quenching times about 600 Myr more recent with respect to those of other Milky Way satellites, on average, even though the respective timings are still compatible within the errors. This finding is consistent with theoretical models that suggest that satellites' SFHs may depend on their host environment at early times, although we caution that within the error bars all galaxies in our sample are consistent with being quenched at a single epoch.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.