Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma, Linear and Nonlinear Random Projections, Random Fourier Features, and Random Kitchen Sinks: Tutorial and Survey
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper provides an overview of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma and techniques related to linear and nonlinear random projections.
- Linear random projection is justified through the JL lemma, with discussions on sparse random projections using $\ell_1$ norm and interpolation norm.
- Two key applications highlighted are low-rank matrix approximation and approximate nearest neighbor search achieved through random projection onto hypercube.
- Advanced methods for nonlinear random projection include Random Fourier Features (RFF) and Random Kitchen Sinks (RKS).
- Other techniques for nonlinear random projection mentioned are extreme learning machine, randomly weighted neural networks, and ensemble of random projections.
Authors: Benyamin Ghojogh, Ali Ghodsi, Fakhri Karray, Mark Crowley
Abstract: This is a tutorial and survey paper on the Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma and linear and nonlinear random projections. We start with linear random projection and then justify its correctness by JL lemma and its proof. Then, sparse random projections with $\ell_1$ norm and interpolation norm are introduced. Two main applications of random projection, which are low-rank matrix approximation and approximate nearest neighbor search by random projection onto hypercube, are explained. Random Fourier Features (RFF) and Random Kitchen Sinks (RKS) are explained as methods for nonlinear random projection. Some other methods for nonlinear random projection, including extreme learning machine, randomly weighted neural networks, and ensemble of random projections, are also introduced.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.