Towards Achieving Trust Through Transparency and Ethics (Pre-Print)

AI-generated keywords: Trustworthiness Transparency Ethics Non-Functional Requirements Socially Responsible Software

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Software and AI are ubiquitous in the products we use today
  • There is an increasing need for consumer trust in these products
  • Lack of transparency and ethics often cause consumers to lose faith in them
  • This lack of trust propagates to the companies behind these products, which is concerning in mission-critical systems like autonomous vehicles and clinical support systems
  • A recent pre-print paper titled "Towards Achieving Trust Through Transparency and Ethics" follows grounded theory principles to elicit knowledge related to Trust, Ethics, and Transparency
  • The authors approach these qualities as Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) with the aim of building catalogs that can help construct Socially Responsible Software
  • The corpus used for this study was built on a selected collection of literature on Corporate Social Responsibility with an emphasis on Business Ethics
  • Results are presented by a catalogue of Trust as a Non-Functional Requirement represented as a Softgoal Interdependency Graph (SIG)
  • This SIG language helps software engineers understand alternatives they have to improve Trust in software products
  • Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into how organizations can achieve trustworthiness through transparency and ethics by approaching these qualities as NFRs and building catalogs for socially responsible software construction.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: David Kwan, Luiz Marcio Cysneiros, Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite

12 pages, 6 figures, 3 tables

Abstract: The ubiquitous presence of software in the products we use, together with Artificial Intelligence in these products, has led to an increasing need for consumer trust. Consumers often lose faith in products, and the lack of Trust propagates to the companies behind them. This is even more so in mission-critical systems such as autonomous vehicles and clinical support systems. This paper follows grounded theory principles to elicit knowledge related to Trust, Ethics, and Transparency. We approach these qualities as Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs), aiming to build catalogs to subsidize the construction of Socially Responsible Software. The corpus we have used was built on a selected collection of literature on Corporate Social Responsibility, with an emphasis on Business Ethics. Our challenge is how to encode the social perspective knowledge, mainly through the view of Corporate Social Responsibility, on how organizations or institutions achieve trustworthiness. Since our ground perspective is that of NFRs, results are presented by a catalogue of Trust as a Non-Functional Requirement, represented as a Softgoal Interdependency Graph (SIG). The SIG language helps software engineers in understanding alternatives they have to improve Trust in software products.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Jul. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2107.02959v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In today's world, software and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are ubiquitous in the products we use. As a result, there is an increasing need for consumer trust in these products. However, consumers often lose faith in them due to various factors such as lack of transparency and ethics. This lack of trust propagates to the companies behind these products, which is especially concerning in mission-critical systems like autonomous vehicles and clinical support systems. To address this issue, a recent pre-print paper titled "Towards Achieving Trust Through Transparency and Ethics" follows grounded theory principles to elicit knowledge related to Trust, Ethics, and Transparency. The authors approach these qualities as Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) with the aim of building catalogs that can help construct Socially Responsible Software. The corpus used for this study was built on a selected collection of literature on Corporate Social Responsibility with an emphasis on Business Ethics. The challenge was how to encode social perspective knowledge mainly through the view of Corporate Social Responsibility on how organizations or institutions achieve trustworthiness. Since the ground perspective is that of NFRs, results are presented by a catalogue of Trust as a Non-Functional Requirement represented as a Softgoal Interdependency Graph (SIG). This SIG language helps software engineers understand alternatives they have to improve Trust in software products. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into how organizations can achieve trustworthiness through transparency and ethics by approaching these qualities as NFRs and building catalogs for socially responsible software construction. By doing so, companies can regain consumer trust in their products while also contributing positively towards society's well-being.
Created on 29 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.