Bitcoin, Currencies, and Bubbles
AI-generated Key Points
- The authors apply quantitative finance methods and economic arguments to cryptocurrencies in general and bitcoin in particular.
- They focus on the most discussed crypto of those that claim to hew to the original protocol (Nakamoto, 2009) and the one with by far the largest market capitalization.
- Bitcoin has failed to satisfy the notion of being a currency without government control as it is not even a currency at all.
- Bitcoin cannot operate as a reliable inflation hedge nor can it be considered a safe haven for investments or a shield against government tyranny.
- There appears to be an underlying conflation between the success of a payment mechanism (as a decentralized mode of exchange), which so far has failed, and the speculative variations in the price of a zero-sum asset with massive negative externalities.
- A true numeraire must be one of minimum variance with respect to an arbitrary basket of goods and services.
- The authors cite several sources including M. Nair and R. Emozozo's article on electronic currency in Africa where they discuss M-pesa as private inside money; K. Colucci and C. Moiso's paper on virtual currencies' phenomenon; J. Murphy-O'Connor's work on Jesus and money changers; M.W Spitznagel's article on why cryptocurrencies will never be safe havens; D.Porechna's update on Darkside hacking incident from Wolfram Research.
- Common misconceptions about Bitcoin include its supposed democratic nature reducing agency problems perceived among civil servants and bankers when in reality there appears to be worse agency problem: insiders hoarding what they think will be the world currency so others would have to go to them later on for supply.
- This is seen as a wealth transfer to the cartel of early bitcoin accumulators.
- The authors question Bitcoin's usefulness as a technology, stating that they only judge a technology by how it solves problems not in what technological attributes it has.
Authors: Nassim Nicholas Taleb
Abstract: We apply quantitative finance methods and economic arguments to cryptocurrencies in general and bitcoin in particular -- as there are about $10,000$ cryptocurrencies, we focus (unless otherwise specified) on the most discussed crypto of those that claim to hew to the original protocol (Nakamoto, 2009) and the one with, by far, the largest market capitalization. In its current version, in spite of the hype, bitcoin failed to satisfy the notion of "currency without government" (it proved to not even be a currency at all), can be neither a short nor long term store of value (its expected value is no higher than $0$), cannot operate as a reliable inflation hedge, and, worst of all, does not constitute, not even remotely, a safe haven for one's investments, a shield against government tyranny, nor a tail protection vehicle for catastrophic episodes. Furthermore, there appears to be an underlying conflation between the success of a payment mechanism (as a decentralized mode of exchange), which so far has failed, and the speculative variations in the price of a zero-sum asset with massive negative externalities. Going through monetary history, we also show how a true numeraire must be one of minimum variance with respect to an arbitrary basket of goods and services, how gold and silver lost their inflation hedge status during the Hunt brothers squeeze in the late 1970s and what would be required from a true inflation hedged store of value.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.