User Acceptance of Gender Stereotypes in Automated Career Recommendations

AI-generated keywords: Fair AI Machine Learning Gender Bias Career Recommendations User Interests

AI-generated Key Points

  • Fair AI and ML research is gaining momentum to mitigate discriminatory bias in algorithms along lines of gender, age, and race.
  • Developing a fair AI algorithm may not be enough to achieve intended results in the real world.
  • A recent study built a fair AI career recommender using gender debiasing machine learning techniques.
  • Offline evaluation showed that the debiased recommender made fairer career recommendations without sacrificing accuracy.
  • An online user study involving over 200 college students revealed that participants preferred the original biased system over the debiased system due to perceived gender disparity being a determining factor for recommendation acceptance.
  • Accurately capturing users' interests and preferences is critical to building an effective recommender system.
  • The study highlights the need for further research to understand and address underlying factors contributing to gender disparity in career recommendations.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Clarice Wang, Kathryn Wang, Andrew Bian, Rashidul Islam, Kamrun Naher Keya, James Foulds, Shimei Pan

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Currently, there is a surge of interest in fair Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) research which aims to mitigate discriminatory bias in AI algorithms, e.g. along lines of gender, age, and race. While most research in this domain focuses on developing fair AI algorithms, in this work, we show that a fair AI algorithm on its own may be insufficient to achieve its intended results in the real world. Using career recommendation as a case study, we build a fair AI career recommender by employing gender debiasing machine learning techniques. Our offline evaluation showed that the debiased recommender makes fairer career recommendations without sacrificing its accuracy. Nevertheless, an online user study of more than 200 college students revealed that participants on average prefer the original biased system over the debiased system. Specifically, we found that perceived gender disparity is a determining factor for the acceptance of a recommendation. In other words, our results demonstrate we cannot fully address the gender bias issue in AI recommendations without addressing the gender bias in humans.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Jun. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2106.07112v2

The field of fair Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) research is gaining momentum as researchers aim to mitigate discriminatory bias in AI algorithms, particularly along lines of gender, age, and race. However, a recent study has shown that developing a fair AI algorithm may not be enough to achieve its intended results in the real world. The study focused on career recommendation as a case study and built a fair AI career recommender using gender debiasing machine learning techniques. The offline evaluation showed that the debiased recommender made fairer career recommendations without sacrificing accuracy. However, an online user study involving over 200 college students revealed that participants preferred the original biased system over the debiased system. Perceived gender disparity was found to be a determining factor for recommendation acceptance. To accurately capture users' interests and preferences, researchers used dimension reduction techniques to group 140K items into categories and selected representative items from each category. The questionnaire used in the study included five sections: demographics, user interests, beliefs about gender-bias in career choice, recommendation acceptance, and general system usability. Participants were also asked two questions to help understand their beliefs about gender roles in career selection. Overall, responses from 202 participants were received through an online survey with minimal personal information collected such as gender identification and academic standing. While 48% of participants identified as female and 49.5% identified as male there were also non-binary individuals who participated in the study. Accurately capturing users' interests and preferences is critical to building an effective recommender system. In this study researchers employed various techniques such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) analysis to identify latent topics related to user interests and preferences. In conclusion while developing fair AI algorithms is crucial for mitigating discriminatory bias addressing gender bias in humans is equally important. The study highlights the need for further research to understand and address the underlying factors that contribute to gender disparity in career recommendations.
Created on 10 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.