Quantum Portfolio Optimization with Investment Bands and Target Volatility

AI-generated keywords: Quantum Computing Portfolio Optimization Investment Bands Target Volatility Exchange Traded Funds (ETF)

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper presents a novel approach to solving the portfolio optimization problem using quantum computing.
  • The authors demonstrate how to incorporate real-life constraints into the optimization problem in a simple manner that makes it amenable to quantum optimization algorithms.
  • The main contributions of the paper are:
  • Explaining how to obtain the best investment portfolio with a given target risk, which is crucial for producing portfolios with different risk profiles that financial institutions typically offer.
  • Showing how to implement individual investment bands, which are minimum and maximum possible investments for each asset, essential for imposing diversification and avoiding corner solutions.
  • The authors build the constrained cost function as a quadratic binary optimization (QUBO) problem, which is the natural input of quantum annealers.
  • They validate their implementation by finding optimal portfolios using D-Wave Hybrid and its Advantage quantum processor on portfolios built with all assets from S&P100 and S&P500 under realistic market conditions.
  • In combination with clustering algorithms, the methods presented in this paper would allow replicating more complex indexes' behavior such as Nasdaq Composite or others. This feature would be particularly useful for building and replicating Exchange Traded Funds (ETF).
  • Overall, this paper presents an innovative approach to portfolio optimization using quantum computing that addresses practical challenges faced by financial institutions while demonstrating its feasibility under realistic market conditions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Samuel Palmer, Serkan Sahin, Rodrigo Hernandez, Samuel Mugel, Roman Orus

arXiv: 2106.06735v4 - DOI (q-fin.PM)
5 pages, 5 figures

Abstract: In this paper we show how to implement in a simple way some complex real-life constraints on the portfolio optimization problem, so that it becomes amenable to quantum optimization algorithms. Specifically, first we explain how to obtain the best investment portfolio with a given target risk. This is important in order to produce portfolios with different risk profiles, as typically offered by financial institutions. Second, we show how to implement individual investment bands, i.e., minimum and maximum possible investments for each asset. This is also important in order to impose diversification and avoid corner solutions. Quite remarkably, we show how to build the constrained cost function as a quadratic binary optimization (QUBO) problem, this being the natural input of quantum annealers. The validity of our implementation is proven by finding the optimal portfolios, using D-Wave Hybrid and its Advantage quantum processor, on portfolios built with all the assets from S&P100 and S&P500. Our results show how practical daily constraints found in quantitative finance can be implemented in a simple way in current NISQ quantum processors, with real data, and under realistic market conditions. In combination with clustering algorithms, our methods would allow to replicate the behaviour of more complex indexes, such as Nasdaq Composite or others, in turn being particularly useful to build and replicate Exchange Traded Funds (ETF).

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Jun. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2106.06735v4

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Quantum Portfolio Optimization with Investment Bands and Target Volatility," Samuel Palmer, Serkan Sahin, Rodrigo Hernandez, Samuel Mugel, and Roman Orus present a novel approach to solving the portfolio optimization problem using quantum computing. The authors demonstrate how to incorporate complex real-life constraints into the optimization problem in a simple manner that makes it amenable to quantum optimization algorithms. The paper's main contributions are twofold: first, the authors explain how to obtain the best investment portfolio with a given target risk. This is crucial for producing portfolios with different risk profiles that financial institutions typically offer. Second, they show how to implement individual investment bands, which are minimum and maximum possible investments for each asset. This is essential for imposing diversification and avoiding corner solutions. The authors build the constrained cost function as a quadratic binary optimization (QUBO) problem, which is the natural input of quantum annealers. They validate their implementation by finding optimal portfolios using D-Wave Hybrid and its Advantage quantum processor on portfolios built with all assets from S&P100 and S&P500. The results demonstrate that practical daily constraints found in quantitative finance can be implemented easily in current NISQ quantum processors using real data under realistic market conditions. In combination with clustering algorithms, the methods presented in this paper would allow replicating more complex indexes' behavior such as Nasdaq Composite or others. This feature would be particularly useful for building and replicating Exchange Traded Funds (ETF). Overall, this paper presents an innovative approach to portfolio optimization using quantum computing that addresses practical challenges faced by financial institutions while demonstrating its feasibility under realistic market conditions.
Created on 06 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.