Focal Plane Wavefront Sensing using Machine Learning: Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks compared to Fundamental Limits
AI-generated Key Points
- Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be used to measure non-common path aberrations (NCPA) based on focal plane images in focal plane wavefront sensing (FPWFS).
- FPWFS is an appealing solution for NCPA measurement and could be used as an adaptive optics wavefront sensor.
- Numerically simulated aberrated point spread function (PSF) pairs were used to generate the labelled dataset required for training the CNNs.
- Phase diversity was introduced to ensure uniqueness of the solution while being easy to implement in practice.
- Each individual Zernike mode had a uniform density distribution with minimum and maximum values depending on the Zernike index, desired median rms WFE, and number of Zernike coefficients.
- Two CNN architectures were considered: ResNet-50 and U-Net which are used respectively to estimate Zernike coefficients or directly the phase.
- In idealized simulations, they demonstrated that CNN-based models can reduce root mean squared wavefront error (WFE) to < λ/1500 for 2 x 10^6 photons in one iteration when estimating 20 Zernike modes.
- They also showed that CNN-based models are sufficiently robust to varying signal-to-noise ratio, under the presence of higher-order aberrations, and under different amplitudes of aberrations.
- Additionally, they displayed similar to superior performance compared to iterative phase retrieval algorithms.
- The authors suggest that CNNs represent a compelling way to implement FPWFS which can leverage its high sensitivity over a broad range of conditions.
- Future work could explore ways to exploit real life data's temporal structure and incorporate it into the training process for improved performance.
Authors: G. Orban de Xivry, M. Quesnel, P. -O. Vanberg, O. Absil, G. Louppe
Abstract: Focal plane wavefront sensing (FPWFS) is appealing for several reasons. Notably, it offers high sensitivity and does not suffer from non-common path aberrations (NCPA). The price to pay is a high computational burden and the need for diversity to lift any phase ambiguity. If those limitations can be overcome, FPWFS is a great solution for NCPA measurement, a key limitation for high-contrast imaging, and could be used as adaptive optics wavefront sensor. Here, we propose to use deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to measure NCPA based on focal plane images. Two CNN architectures are considered: ResNet-50 and U-Net which are used respectively to estimate Zernike coefficients or directly the phase. The models are trained on labelled datasets and evaluated at various flux levels and for two spatial frequency contents (20 and 100 Zernike modes). In these idealized simulations we demonstrate that the CNN-based models reach the photon noise limit in a large range of conditions. We show, for example, that the root mean squared (rms) wavefront error (WFE) can be reduced to < $\lambda$/1500 for $2 \times 10^6$ photons in one iteration when estimating 20 Zernike modes. We also show that CNN-based models are sufficiently robust to varying signal-to-noise ratio, under the presence of higher-order aberrations, and under different amplitudes of aberrations. Additionally, they display similar to superior performance compared to iterative phase retrieval algorithms. CNNs therefore represent a compelling way to implement FPWFS, which can leverage the high sensitivity of FPWFS over a broad range of conditions.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.