Quantification of Carbon Sequestration in Urban Forests

AI-generated keywords: Urban Forests Carbon Sequestration Multi-Spectral Imagery LiDAR Data Machine Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Vegetation, especially trees, play a crucial role in sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere
  • Accurately quantifying the amount of carbon stored in trees has been a challenge due to the lack of efficient measurement methods
  • The authors propose an innovative approach to estimate carbon storage in trees by combining multi-spectral aerial imagery and LiDAR data
  • By analyzing tree coverage, geometric shape, and species information derived from these datasets, they are able to determine the biomass of individual trees and estimate the amount of carbon sequestered
  • The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach by applying it to New York City's borough Manhattan, estimating 52,000 tons of carbon sequestered in trees within this area
  • This information is valuable for understanding the contribution of urban forests to carbon sequestration efforts and can be used for monitoring and managing urban green spaces
  • Relevant studies and resources referenced include Pettorelli's work on NDVI, Sileshi's critical review on forest biomass estimation models, Thomas and Martin's synthesis on the carbon content of tree tissues, Wang et al.'s methods for tree-crown delineation and treetop detection using high-resolution aerial imagery, Zhou and Klein's study on monitoring wildfire impacts using deep learning, Zhou et al.'s work on PAIRS AutoGeo for analyzing large-scale geospatial data
  • Transparent and verifiable methods for quantifying carbon sequestration are important in the context of carbon trading markets and greenhouse gas offset initiatives
  • The "bottom-up" approach presented in this study provides a reliable means to estimate total carbon sequestration in trees enabling the development of spatial maps that track changes in carbon density over time
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Levente J. Klein, Wang Zhou, Conrad M. Albrecht

International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2021) Workshop
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Vegetation, trees in particular, sequester carbon by absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, the lack of efficient quantification methods of carbon stored in trees renders it difficult to track the process. We present an approach to estimate the carbon storage in trees based on fusing multi-spectral aerial imagery and LiDAR data to identify tree coverage, geometric shape, and tree species -- key attributes to carbon storage quantification. We demonstrate that tree species information and their three-dimensional geometric shapes can be estimated from aerial imagery in order to determine the tree's biomass. Specifically, we estimate a total of $52,000$ tons of carbon sequestered in trees for New York City's borough Manhattan.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jun. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2106.00182v2

Vegetation, especially trees, play a crucial role in sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, accurately quantifying the amount of carbon stored in trees has been a challenge due to the lack of efficient measurement methods. In this study, the authors propose an innovative approach to estimate carbon storage in trees by combining multi-spectral aerial imagery and LiDAR data. By analyzing tree coverage, geometric shape, and species information derived from these datasets, they are able to determine the biomass of individual trees and subsequently estimate the amount of carbon sequestered. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach by applying it to New York City's borough Manhattan. Based on their analysis, they estimate that a total of 52,000 tons of carbon is sequestered in trees within this area. This information is valuable for understanding the contribution of urban forests to carbon sequestration efforts and can be used for monitoring and managing urban green spaces. To support their findings, the authors reference several relevant studies and resources. They mention Pettorelli's work on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), which is commonly used to assess vegetation health and density. Sileshi's critical review on forest biomass estimation models is also cited as a reference for addressing common mistakes in such calculations. Additionally, Thomas and Martin's synthesis on the carbon content of tree tissues provides insights into understanding how different parts of trees contribute to overall carbon storage. The authors also highlight previous research by Wang et al., who developed methods for individual tree-crown delineation and treetop detection using high-resolution aerial imagery. This work demonstrates how advanced imaging techniques can be utilized for accurate tree species identification and biomass estimation. Furthermore, Zhou and Klein's study on monitoring wildfire impacts on tree species using deep learning showcases another application of remote sensing technologies in assessing changes in forest ecosystems over time. The authors also mention Zhou et al. 's work on PAIRS AutoGeo, an automated machine learning framework for analyzing large-scale geospatial data which highlights the potential for scalable and efficient analysis of carbon sequestration in urban forests. In terms of broader impact, the authors emphasize the importance of transparent and verifiable methods for quantifying carbon sequestration particularly in the context of carbon trading markets and greenhouse gas offset initiatives. The "bottom-up" approach presented in this study provides a reliable means to estimate total carbon sequestration in trees enabling the development of spatial maps that track changes in carbon density over time. This information can inform decision-making processes related to urban planning conservation efforts and climate change mitigation strategies.
Created on 30 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.