Potential Global Sequestration of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide by Semi-Arid Forestation
AI-generated Key Points
- Study focused on carbon sequestration in the Yatir forest, a 28 km² Aleppo pine forest in Israel
- Organic carbon sequestration rate measured using Eddy Covariance flux and Carbon Stock counting methods: 550 grams of CO2 per square meter per year
- Estimated global organic sequestration rate after future global forestation: approximately 3.0 billion tons of CO2 per year (20% coverage of global semi-arid area)
- Inorganic carbon sequestration observed in Yatir forest through tree root exhalation of CO2, hydration by soil water, and precipitation of calcite
- Annual calcite precipitation rate measured at Yatir: 22 mg of CO2 per liter per year for sediment at a core depth of 2.2 meters
- Extrapolated estimate for global inorganic carbon sequestration: around 0.8 billion tons of CO2 per year assuming a global semi-arid average root respiration depth of 6 meters
- Total estimated carbon sequestration rate (organic + inorganic): approximately 4 billion tons of CO2 per year
- Highlights potential for carbon sequestration through widespread tree planting in semi-arid regions and emphasizes the need for further measurements and implementation of a global land management policy to reduce atmospheric CO2 levels
Authors: Rafat Qubaja, Murray Moinester, Joel Kronfeld
Abstract: Carbon sequestration was studied in the planted Israeli Yatir forest, a 28 ${km}^2$ Aleppo pine forest growing at the semi-arid timberline (with no irrigation or fertilization). The organic carbon sequestration rate (above and below ground) was measured as 550 gram $CO_2 {m}^{-2} {yr}^{-1}$, by Eddy Covariance flux and Carbon Stock counting methods. Assuming that the soil composition at Yatir is representative, we estimate a global organic sequestration rate of roughly 3.0 billion tons $CO_2$ per year, after future global forestation, by extrapolating to 20% of the global semi-arid area. Consider now the inorganic carbon sequestration rate. $CO_2$ exhaled into the soil by tree roots is hydrated by soil water to produce mainly bicarbonate ${{HCO}_3}^-$, which combines with soil ${Ca}^{2+}$ to precipitate calcite ${CaCO}_3$. We quantify the annual sequestration rate in Yatir soil cores by measuring the decreased density versus depth, of bicarbonates in the liquid phase of the soil unsaturated zone (USZ). We found that the bicarbonate concentration decreases with depth, as the calcite precipitates and is incorporated within the USZ. The depth profiles were converted to time profiles, taking into account the $\approx 11 cm/yr$ annual rate of downward water percolation at Yatir. In 1 Liter of sediment, using data from a core depth of 2.2 meters, the calcite precipitation rate was measured as 22 mg $CO_2 {yr}^{-1} L^{-1}$. Taking 6 m as the global semi-arid average depth of root respiration, extrapolating as above, roughly 0.8 billion tons of $CO_2$ could potentially be sequestered globally each year. The total organic plus inorganic sequestration rate is then $\approx 4$ billion tons $CO_2$ per year. This demonstrates the global potential, the need for further measurements, and the need to begin implementing a global land management policy of widespread tree planting in semi-arid regions.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.