Microservice Maturity of Organizations: towards an assessment framework

AI-generated keywords: Microservices Maturity Model MiMMo Readiness Agility

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of online services and diverse demands
  • Organizations are relying on distributed web applications and Line of Business software
  • Microservices are the most suitable delivery application architectural style
  • Adopting microservices is complex and highly risk-prone
  • MiMMo framework assessment allows organizations to diagnose their capacity to properly adopt microservices through initial milestones
  • MiMMo results from observations of about thirty organizations writing software
  • Using the model, an organization can evaluate itself in two dimensions and five maturity levels
  • Microservices allow agility not only on the technical application but also on enterprise architecture as a whole, influencing the actual financial business of the company.
  • MiMMo provides a comprehensive approach for assessing an organization's readiness for adopting microservices based on its actual situation.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jean-Philippe Gouigoux (IUT Nantes, LS2N), Dalila Tamzalit (IUT Nantes, LS2N), Joost Noppen

International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, May 2021, Virtual, Cyprus. pp.523-540

Abstract: This early work aims to allow organizations to diagnose their capacity to properly adopt microservices through initial milestones of a Microservice Maturity Model (MiMMo). The objective is to prepare the way towards a general framework to help companies and industries to determine their microservices maturity. Organizations lean more and more on distributed web applications and Line of Business software. This is particularly relevant during the current Covid-19 crisis, where companies are even more challenged to offer their services online, targeting a very high level of responsiveness in the face of rapidly increasing and diverse demands. For this, microservices remain the most suitable delivery application architectural style. They allow agility not only on the technical application, as often considered, but on the enterprise architecture as a whole, influencing the actual financial business of the company. However, microservices adoption is highly risk-prone and complex. Before they establish an appropriate migration plan, first and foremost, companies must assess their degree of readiness to adopt microservices. For this, MiMMo, a Microservices Maturity Model framework assessment, is proposed to help companies assess their readiness for the microservice architectural style, based on their actual situation. MiMMo results from observations of and experience with about thirty organizations writing software. It conceptualizes and generalizes the progression paths they have followed to adopt microservices appropriately. Using the model, an organization can evaluate itself in two dimensions and five maturity levels and thus: (i) benchmark itself on its current use of microservices; (ii) project the next steps it needs to achieve a higher maturity level and (iii) analyze how it has evolved and maintain a global coherence between technical and business stakes.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 May. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.14935v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of online services and the need for companies to be responsive to rapidly increasing and diverse demands. As a result, organizations are increasingly relying on distributed web applications and Line of Business software, making microservices the most suitable delivery application architectural style. However, adopting microservices is complex and highly risk-prone, requiring companies to assess their readiness before establishing an appropriate migration plan. To address this challenge, Jean-Philippe Gouigoux, Dalila Tamzalit, and Joost Noppen propose a Microservice Maturity Model (MiMMo) framework assessment that allows organizations to diagnose their capacity to properly adopt microservices through initial milestones. The objective is to prepare the way towards a general framework that helps companies and industries determine their microservices maturity. MiMMo results from observations of about thirty organizations writing software. It conceptualizes and generalizes the progression paths they have followed to adopt microservices appropriately. Using the model, an organization can evaluate itself in two dimensions and five maturity levels. This enables them to benchmark themselves on their current use of microservices, project the next steps needed to achieve a higher maturity level, and analyze how they have evolved while maintaining global coherence between technical and business stakes. Microservices allow agility not only on the technical application but also on enterprise architecture as a whole, influencing the actual financial business of the company. MiMMo provides a comprehensive approach for assessing an organization's readiness for adopting microservices based on its actual situation. By using MiMMo as a guidepost towards achieving higher levels of maturity in adopting microservices appropriately, organizations can ensure that they remain competitive in today's fast-paced digital environment.
Created on 11 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.