The three-step workflow: a pragmatic approach to allocating academic hospitals' affiliations for bibliometric purposes

AI-generated keywords: Leiden Ranking

AI-generated Key Points

  • The Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University has proposed a three-step workflow to classify the varying degrees of interdependency between academic hospitals and universities in the context of the Leiden Ranking.
  • The proposed workflow aligns the university-hospital relationship with one of three general models: full integration, health science centres, and collaboration and support structures.
  • This classification system provides a standard by which publications noting affiliations with academic hospitals can be allocated.
  • The three-step workflow translates these models into two types of instrumental relationships for publication assignation: "associate" and "component".
  • When a hospital is fully integrated or part of a health science centre, it is classified as component; when it follows the model of collaboration and support, it is classified as associate.
  • Data compiled following these standards allows for more uniform comparison between worldwide educational and research systems.
  • The paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Data and Information Science under grant agreement no: 313082.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Clara Calero-Medina, Martijn S. Visser

19 pages, 4 figures, 1 table
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: This paper presents a method for classifying the varying degrees of interdependency between academic hospitals and universities in the context of the Leiden Ranking. A key question for ranking universities is whether or not to allocate the publication output of affiliated hospitals to universities. Hospital nomenclatures vary worldwide to denote some form of collaboration with a university: academic hospitals, teaching hospitals, university hospitals, and academic medical centres do not correspond to universally standard definitions. Thus, rather than seeking a normative definition of academic hospitals, we are proposing a workflow that aligns the university-hospital relationship with one of three general models: full integration of the hospital and the medical faculty into a single organization; health science centres in which hospitals and medical faculty remain separate entities albeit within the same governance structure; and structures in which universities and hospitals are separate entities which collaborate with one another. This classification system provides a standard by which we can allocate publications which note affiliations with academic hospitals. Our three-step workflow effectively translates the three above-mentioned models into two types of instrumental relationships for the assignation of publications: "associate" and "component". When a hospital and a medical faculty are fully integrated or when a hospital is part of a health science centre, the relationship is classified as component. When a hospital follows the model of collaboration and support, the relationship is classified as associate. The compilation of data following these standards allows for a more uniform comparison between worldwide educational and research systems.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 May. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.13791v1

The Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University has proposed a three-step workflow to classify the varying degrees of interdependency between academic hospitals and universities in the context of the Leiden Ranking. The ranking system raises questions about whether or not to allocate publication output of affiliated hospitals to universities, as hospital nomenclatures vary worldwide and do not correspond to universally standard definitions. Rather than seeking a normative definition, the proposed workflow aligns the university-hospital relationship with one of three general models: full integration, health science centres, and collaboration and support structures. This classification system provides a standard by which publications noting affiliations with academic hospitals can be allocated. The three-step workflow translates these models into two types of instrumental relationships for publication assignation: "associate" and "component". When a hospital is fully integrated or part of a health science centre, it is classified as component; when it follows the model of collaboration and support, it is classified as associate. Data compiled following these standards allows for more uniform comparison between worldwide educational and research systems. The paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Data and Information Science under grant agreement no: 313082.
Created on 05 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.