Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.13791v1

The Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University has proposed a three-step workflow to classify the varying degrees of interdependency between academic hospitals and universities in the context of the Leiden Ranking. The ranking system raises questions about whether or not to allocate publication output of affiliated hospitals to universities, as hospital nomenclatures vary worldwide and do not correspond to universally standard definitions. Rather than seeking a normative definition, the proposed workflow aligns the university-hospital relationship with one of three general models: full integration, health science centres, and collaboration and support structures. This classification system provides a standard by which publications noting affiliations with academic hospitals can be allocated. The three-step workflow translates these models into two types of instrumental relationships for publication assignation: "associate" and "component". When a hospital is fully integrated or part of a health science centre, it is classified as component; when it follows the model of collaboration and support, it is classified as associate. Data compiled following these standards allows for more uniform comparison between worldwide educational and research systems. The paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Data and Information Science under grant agreement no: 313082.

• - The Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University has proposed a three-step workflow to classify the varying degrees of interdependency between academic hospitals and universities in the context of the Leiden Ranking.
• - The proposed workflow aligns the university-hospital relationship with one of three general models: full integration, health science centres, and collaboration and support structures.
• - This classification system provides a standard by which publications noting affiliations with academic hospitals can be allocated.
• - The three-step workflow translates these models into two types of instrumental relationships for publication assignation: "associate" and "component".
• - When a hospital is fully integrated or part of a health science centre, it is classified as component; when it follows the model of collaboration and support, it is classified as associate.
• - Data compiled following these standards allows for more uniform comparison between worldwide educational and research systems.
• - The paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Data and Information Science under grant agreement no: 313082.

The Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University made a plan to group hospitals and universities into three categories based on how they work together. This helps people know which hospital is connected to which university when they see research papers. The three categories are full integration, health science centres, and collaboration and support structures. They also made two groups called "associate" and "component" to help sort the research papers. This makes it easier to compare different schools around the world. A paper about this plan will be published in a journal called the Journal of Data and Information Science." Definitions: - Interdependency: when two or more things depend on each other - Affiliations: connections or relationships between different groups or organizations - Standard: a set of rules or guidelines that everyone follows - Instrumental relationships: relationships that help achieve a goal or purpose - Component: something that is part of a larger whole - Collaboration: working together with others towards a common goal

Understanding the Interdependency between Academic Hospitals and Universities: A Three-Step Workflow

The Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University has proposed a three-step workflow to classify the varying degrees of interdependency between academic hospitals and universities in the context of the Leiden Ranking. The ranking system raises questions about whether or not to allocate publication output of affiliated hospitals to universities, as hospital nomenclatures vary worldwide and do not correspond to universally standard definitions. Rather than seeking a normative definition, the proposed workflow aligns the university-hospital relationship with one of three general models: full integration, health science centres, and collaboration and support structures. This classification system provides a standard by which publications noting affiliations with academic hospitals can be allocated.

The Three Step Workflow

The three-step workflow translates these models into two types of instrumental relationships for publication assignation: "associate" and "component". When a hospital is fully integrated or part of a health science centre, it is classified as component; when it follows the model of collaboration and support, it is classified as associate. Data compiled following these standards allows for more uniform comparison between worldwide educational and research systems.

Benefits Of The System

This classification system offers numerous benefits for both academic institutions and researchers alike. For universities, this system provides an easy way to accurately track their associated hospital's publications in order to create more accurate rankings that reflect their true impact on education and research outcomes. For researchers, this system ensures that all contributions are properly attributed regardless of where they are located geographically or institutionally - allowing them to receive appropriate credit for their work without having to worry about discrepancies due to different naming conventions across countries or regions.

Conclusion

The paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Data & Information Science under grant agreement no: 313082. By providing an efficient method for classifying interdependent relationships between academic hospitals and universities through its three-step workflow process, CWTS’s proposal promises greater accuracy in measuring research performance while also ensuring equitable recognition for all contributors regardless of location or affiliation status - making it an invaluable tool in understanding how best to measure educational excellence around the world today.