Cosmic Velocity Field Reconstruction Using AI
AI-generated Key Points
- Deep learning technique for inferring non-linear velocity field from dark matter density field
- Utilize U-net style convolutional neural network architecture with 15 convolution layers and 2 deconvolution layers
- Map $32^3$-voxel density field to $20^3$-voxel velocity or momentum fields
- Analyze dark matter simulation with resolution of $2 {h^{-1}}{\rm Mpc}$
- Neural network accurately predicts non-linearity, complexity, and vorticity of velocity and momentum fields
- Captures power spectra value, divergence, and vorticity up to $k\simeq1.4$ $h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ with relative error ranging from 1% to $\lesssim$10%
- Neural networks have advantage over perturbation theory in reconstructing velocity or momentum fields
- Deep learning techniques capture complex non-linear relationships between physical quantities
- Dataset and data processing methods discussed in detail
- Construction and architecture of neural network explained
- Findings contribute to understanding cosmic structure formation and have implications for astrophysical applications such as galaxy formation and large-scale structure evolution
Authors: Ziyong Wu, Zhenyu Zhang, Shuyang Pan, Haitao Miao, Xin Wang, Cristiano G. Sabiu, Jaime Forero-Romero, Yang Wang, Xiao-Dong Li
Abstract: We develop a deep learning technique to infer the non-linear velocity field from the dark matter density field. The deep learning architecture we use is an "U-net" style convolutional neural network, which consists of 15 convolution layers and 2 deconvolution layers. This setup maps the 3-dimensional density field of $32^3$-voxels to the 3-dimensional velocity or momentum fields of $20^3$-voxels. Through the analysis of the dark matter simulation with a resolution of $2 {h^{-1}}{\rm Mpc}$, we find that the network can predict the the non-linearity, complexity and vorticity of the velocity and momentum fields, as well as the power spectra of their value, divergence and vorticity and its prediction accuracy reaches the range of $k\simeq1.4$ $h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ with a relative error ranging from 1% to $\lesssim$10%. A simple comparison shows that neural networks may have an overwhelming advantage over perturbation theory in the reconstruction of velocity or momentum fields.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.