Correlation in Neuronal Calcium Spiking: Quantification based on Empirical Mutual Information Rate

Authors: Sathish Ande, Srinivas Avasarala, Ajith Karunarathne, Lopamudra Giri, Soumya Jana

arXiv: 2105.03400v1 - DOI (q-bio.NC)
arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2102.00723
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Quantification of neuronal correlations in neuron populations helps us to understand neural coding rules. Such quantification could also reveal how neurons encode information in normal and disease conditions like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. While neurons communicate with each other by transmitting spikes, there would be a change in calcium concentration within the neurons inherently. Accordingly, there would be correlations in calcium spike trains and they could have heterogeneous memory structures. In this context, estimation of mutual information rate in calcium spike trains assumes primary significance. However, such estimation is difficult with available methods which would consider longer blocks for convergence without noticing that neuronal information changes in short time windows. Against this backdrop, we propose a faster method that exploits the memory structures in pair of calcium spike trains to quantify mutual information shared between them. Our method has shown superior performance with example Markov processes as well as experimental spike trains. Such mutual information rate analysis could be used to identify signatures of neuronal behavior in large populations in normal and abnormal conditions.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 May. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.03400v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 10 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.