An Energy-Based View of Graph Neural Networks

AI-generated keywords: Graph Neural Networks Energy-Based View Robustness Kipf & Welling Machine Learning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Graph neural networks are designed to work with graph-structured data
  • These models can suffer from limited robustness when dealing with noisy or incomplete graphs
  • Researchers propose combining graph neural networks with the energy-based view of Grathwohl et al.
  • The authors successfully implement this framework by introducing a novel method to ensure generation over features as well as the adjacency matrix
  • Their approach achieves comparable discriminative performance while improving robustness compared to the standard graph convolutional network (GCN) architecture proposed by Kipf & Welling (2016)
  • This research opens up promising new directions for future studies on energy-based graph neural networks, which could lead to more effective and efficient models for processing complex graph-structured data
  • Combining multiple techniques can lead to better results than relying on a single approach alone.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: John Y. Shin, Prathamesh Dharangutte

-Updated with new references. -Accepted to the ICLR2021 EBM Workshop

Abstract: Graph neural networks are a popular variant of neural networks that work with graph-structured data. In this work, we consider combining graph neural networks with the energy-based view of Grathwohl et al. (2019) with the aim of obtaining a more robust classifier. We successfully implement this framework by proposing a novel method to ensure generation over features as well as the adjacency matrix and evaluate our method against the standard graph convolutional network (GCN) architecture (Kipf & Welling (2016)). Our approach obtains comparable discriminative performance while improving robustness, opening promising new directions for future research for energy-based graph neural networks.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Apr. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2104.13492v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In recent years, graph neural networks have emerged as a popular variant of neural networks that are designed to work with graph-structured data. However, these models can suffer from limited robustness when dealing with noisy or incomplete graphs. To address this issue, researchers John Y. Shin and Prathamesh Dharangutte propose combining graph neural networks with the energy-based view of Grathwohl et al. The authors successfully implement this framework by introducing a novel method to ensure generation over features as well as the adjacency matrix. They then evaluate their approach against the standard graph convolutional network (GCN) architecture proposed by Kipf & Welling (2016). The results show that their approach achieves comparable discriminative performance while improving robustness. This research opens up promising new directions for future studies on energy-based graph neural networks, which could lead to more effective and efficient models for processing complex graph-structured data. Overall, this work highlights the potential benefits of integrating different approaches in machine learning and deep learning to improve model performance and address real-world challenges. It demonstrates how combining multiple techniques can lead to better results than relying on a single approach alone.
Created on 10 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.