An HST/STIS View of Protoplanetary Disks in Upper Scorpius: Observations of Three Young M-Stars

AI-generated keywords: Protoplanetary disks STIS Hubble Space Telescope Visible Scattered Light Upper Scorpius OB association

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Samuel Walker and colleagues observed three protoplanetary disks in visible scattered light around M-type stars in the Upper Scorpius OB association
  • The team used the STIS instrument on the Hubble Space Telescope to observe the disks around stars 2MASS J16090075-1908526, 2MASS J16142029-1906481, and 2MASS J16123916-1859284
  • Classical subtraction was found to be the most reliable reduction technique for their observations
  • Two of the three disks were tentatively detected and exhibited structure out to projected distances of over 200 au - structures at these distances from the host star have never been previously detected at any wavelength for either disk
  • Visible-wavelength observations can provide valuable insights into our understanding of protoplanetary disk structures and their evolution around young M-type stars in our galaxy
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Samuel Walker, Maxwell Millar-Blanchaer, Bin Ren, Paul Kalas, John Carpenter

arXiv: 2104.06447v1 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
Accepted for publication in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract: We present observations of three protoplanetary disks in visible scattered light around M-type stars in the Upper Scorpius OB association using the STIS instrument on the Hubble Space Telescope. The disks around stars 2MASS J16090075-1908526, 2MASS J16142029-1906481 and 2MASS J16123916-1859284 have all been previously detected with ALMA, and 2MASS J16123916-1859284 has never previously been imaged at scattered light wavelengths. We process our images using Reference Differential Imaging, comparing and contrasting three reduction techniques - classical subtraction, Karhunen-Loeve Image Projection and Non-Negative Matrix Factorisation, selecting the classical method as the most reliable of the three for our observations. Of the three disks, two are tentatively detected (2MASS J16142029-1906481 and 2MASS J16123916-1859284), with the third going undetected. Our two detections are shown to be consistent when varying the reference star or reduction method used, and both detections exhibit structure out to projected distances of > 200 au. Structures at these distances from the host star have never been previously detected at any wavelength for either disk, illustrating the utility of visible-wavelength observations in probing the distribution of small dust grains at large angular separations.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Apr. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2104.06447v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In a recent study, Samuel Walker and colleagues present their observations of three protoplanetary disks in visible scattered light around M-type stars in the Upper Scorpius OB association. The team used the STIS instrument on the Hubble Space Telescope to observe the disks around stars 2MASS J16090075-1908526, 2MASS J16142029-1906481, and 2MASS J16123916-1859284. While all three disks had been previously detected with ALMA, 2MASS J16123916-1859284 had never before been imaged at scattered light wavelengths. The researchers processed their images using Reference Differential Imaging and compared and contrasted three reduction techniques - classical subtraction, Karhunen-Loeve Image Projection (KLIP), and Non-Negative Matrix Factorisation (NMF). They found that the classical method was the most reliable for their observations. Of the three disks observed, two were tentatively detected (2MASS J16142029-1906481 and 2MASS J16123916-1859284), while the third went undetected. The two detections were shown to be consistent when varying the reference star or reduction method used. Both detections exhibited structure out to projected distances of over 200 au - structures at these distances from the host star have never been previously detected at any wavelength for either disk. These findings illustrate the utility of visible-wavelength observations in probing the distribution of small dust grains at large angular separations. The authors suggest that future studies should continue to explore this technique as a means of detecting new features in protoplanetary disks. Moreover, they emphasize that such observations can provide valuable insights into our understanding of protoplanetary disk structures and their evolution around young M-type stars in our galaxy.
Created on 28 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.