On Medical Device Cybersecurity Compliance in EU

AI-generated keywords: Medical Device Regulation In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation Cybersecurity Requirements Regulatory Framework Product Development

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The European Union has implemented new regulatory requirements for medical device manufacturers
  • The Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation (IVDR) have increased regulatory oversight, particularly for medical software, and explicitly address cybersecurity requirements
  • These changes present unique challenges for manufacturers to comply with the regulatory framework
  • A paper reviews the new cybersecurity requirements in light of available guidance documents and identifies four core concepts for building cybersecurity compliance
  • The authors argue that these concepts form a foundation for complying with EU regulations on medical device cybersecurity
  • This paper provides valuable insights into navigating the complex landscape of medical device regulation in the EU
  • Highlighting the importance of prioritizing cybersecurity in product development.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tuomas Granlund, Juha Vedenpää, Vlad Stirbu, Tommi Mikkonen

Abstract: The medical device products at the European Union market must be safe and effective. To ensure this, medical device manufacturers must comply to the new regulatory requirements brought by the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation (IVDR). In general, the new regulations increase regulatory requirements and oversight, especially for medical software, and this is also true for requirements related to cybersecurity, which are now explicitly addressed in the legislation. The significant legislation changes currently underway, combined with increased cybersecurity requirements, create unique challenges for manufacturers to comply with the regulatory framework. In this paper, we review the new cybersecurity requirements in the light of currently available guidance documents, and pinpoint four core concepts around which cybersecurity compliance can be built. We argue that these core concepts form a foundations for cybersecurity compliance in the European Union regulatory framework.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Mar. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2103.06809v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The European Union has implemented new regulatory requirements for medical device manufacturers to ensure the safety and effectiveness of their products. The Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation (IVDR) have increased regulatory oversight, particularly for medical software, and explicitly address cybersecurity requirements. These changes present unique challenges for manufacturers to comply with the regulatory framework. In response, this paper reviews the new cybersecurity requirements in light of available guidance documents and identifies four core concepts for building cybersecurity compliance. The authors argue that these concepts form a foundation for complying with EU regulations on medical device cybersecurity. This paper provides valuable insights into navigating the complex landscape of medical device regulation in the EU and highlights the importance of prioritizing cybersecurity in product development.
Created on 03 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.