Restoring Execution Environments of Jupyter Notebooks

AI-generated keywords: Reproducibility Jupyter Notebooks SnifferDog Execution Environments ICSE 2021

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Lack of dependency information in published Jupyter notebooks causes reproducibility issues in scientific research
  • Over 90% of Jupyter notebooks do not state external package dependencies, making them non-executable and hindering reproducibility
  • SnifferDog is an approach presented by Jiawei Wang, Li Li, and Andreas Zeller to address this problem
  • SnifferDog collects APIs of Python packages and versions to create a database and analyzes notebooks to determine required packages and versions
  • SnifferDog can precisely restore execution environments for a significant majority of notebooks, making them immediately executable for end-users
  • The proposed approach has significant implications for scientific research as it enables accurate and efficient reproduction of experiments while facilitating collaboration between researchers.
  • The paper will be published in the 43rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2021).
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jiawei Wang, Li Li, Andreas Zeller

to be published in the 43rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2021)
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: More than ninety percent of published Jupyter notebooks do not state dependencies on external packages. This makes them non-executable and thus hinders reproducibility of scientific results. We present SnifferDog, an approach that 1) collects the APIs of Python packages and versions, creating a database of APIs; 2) analyzes notebooks to determine candidates for required packages and versions; and 3) checks which packages are required to make the notebook executable (and ideally, reproduce its stored results). In its evaluation, we show that SnifferDog precisely restores execution environments for the largest majority of notebooks, making them immediately executable for end users.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Mar. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2103.02959v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Restoring Execution Environments of Jupyter Notebooks," Jiawei Wang, Li Li, and Andreas Zeller address the issue of reproducibility in scientific research caused by the lack of dependency information in published Jupyter notebooks. They highlight that over ninety percent of these notebooks do not state external package dependencies, rendering them non-executable and hindering the reproducibility of scientific results. To address this problem, the authors present SnifferDog, an approach that collects APIs of Python packages and versions to create a database. The tool then analyzes notebooks to determine required packages and versions before checking which packages are necessary to make the notebook executable and reproduce its stored results. In their evaluation, they show that SnifferDog can precisely restore execution environments for a significant majority of notebooks, making them immediately executable for end-users. This paper is set to be published in the 43rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2021). The proposed approach has significant implications for scientific research as it enables researchers to accurately and efficiently reproduce experiments while also facilitating collaboration between researchers by providing a standardized method for sharing code with all necessary dependencies included.
Created on 18 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.